Evaluating the ethics of autonomous systems

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used to help optimize decision-making in high-stakes settings. For instance, an autonomous system can identify a power distribution strategy that minimizes costs while keeping voltages stable.

But while these AI-driven outputs may be technically optimal, are they fair? What if a low-cost power distribution strategy leaves disadvantaged neighborhoods more vulnerable to outages than higher-income areas?

To help stakeholders quickly pinpoint potential ethical dilemmas before deployment, MIT researchers developed an automated evaluation method that balances the interplay between measurable outcomes, like cost or reliability, and qualitative or subjective values, such as fairness.   

The system separates objective evaluations from user-defined human values, using a large language model (LLM) as a proxy for humans to capture and incorporate stakeholder preferences. 

The adaptive framework selects the best scenarios for further evaluation, streamlining a process that typically requires costly and time-consuming manual effort. These test cases can show situations where autonomous systems align well with human values, as well as scenarios that unexpectedly fall short of ethical criteria.

“We can insert a lot of rules and guardrails into AI systems, but those safeguards can only prevent the things we can imagine happening. It is not enough to say, ‘Let’s just use AI because it has been trained on this information.’ We wanted to develop a more systematic way to discover the unknown unknowns and have a way to predict them before anything bad happens,” says senior author Chuchu Fan, an associate professor in the MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AeroAstro) and a principal investigator in the MIT Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS).

Fan is joined on the paper by lead author Anjali Parashar, a mechanical engineering graduate student; Yingke Li, an AeroAstro postdoc; and others at MIT and Saab. The research will be presented at the International Conference on Learning Representations.

Evaluating ethics

In a large system like a power grid, evaluating the ethical alignment of an AI model’s recommendations in a way that considers all objectives is especially difficult.

Most testing frameworks rely on pre-collected data, but labeled data on subjective ethical criteria are often hard to come by. In addition, because ethical values and AI systems are both constantly evolving, static evaluation methods based on written codes or regulatory documents require frequent updates.

Fan and her team approached this problem from a different perspective. Drawing on their prior work evaluating robotic systems, they developed an experimental design framework to identify the most informative scenarios, which human stakeholders would then evaluate more closely.

Their two-part system, called Scalable Experimental Design for System-level Ethical Testing (SEED-SET), incorporates quantitative metrics and ethical criteria. It can identify scenarios that effectively meet measurable requirements and align well with human values, and vice versa.   

“We don’t want to spend all our resources on random evaluations. So, it is very important to guide the framework toward the test cases we care the most about,” Li says.

Importantly, SEED-SET does not need pre-existing evaluation data, and it adapts to multiple objectives.

For instance, a power grid may have several user groups, including a large rural community and a data center. While both groups may want low-cost and reliable power, each group’s priority from an ethical perspective may vary widely.

These ethical criteria may not be well-specified, so they can’t be measured analytically.

The power grid operator wants to find the most cost-effective strategy that best meets the subjective ethical preferences of all stakeholders.

SEED-SET tackles this challenge by splitting the problem into two, following a hierarchical structure. An objective model considers how the system performs on tangible metrics like cost. Then a subjective model that considers stakeholder judgements, like perceived fairness, builds on the objective evaluation.

“The objective part of our approach is tied to the AI system, while the subjective part is tied to the users who are evaluating it. By decomposing the preferences in a hierarchical fashion, we can generate the desired scenarios with fewer evaluations,” Parashar says.

Encoding subjectivity

To perform the subjective assessment, the system uses an LLM as a proxy for human evaluators. The researchers encode the preferences of each user group into a natural language prompt for the model.

The LLM uses these instructions to compare two scenarios, selecting the preferred design based on the ethical criteria.

“After seeing hundreds or thousands of scenarios, a human evaluator can suffer from fatigue and become inconsistent in their evaluations, so we use an LLM-based strategy instead,” Parashar explains.

SEED-SET uses the selected scenario to simulate the overall system (in this case, a power distribution strategy). These simulation results guide its search for the next best candidate scenario to test.

In the end, SEED-SET intelligently selects the most representative scenarios that either meet or are not aligned with objective metrics and ethical criteria. In this way, users can analyze the performance of the AI system and adjust its strategy.

For instance, SEED-SET can pinpoint cases of power distribution that prioritize higher-income areas during periods of peak demand, leaving underprivileged neighborhoods more prone to outages.

To test SEED-SET, the researchers evaluated realistic autonomous systems, like an AI-driven power grid and an urban traffic routing system. They measured how well the generated scenarios aligned with ethical criteria.

The system generated more than twice as many optimal test cases as the baseline strategies in the same amount of time, while uncovering many scenarios other approaches overlooked.

“As we shifted the user preferences, the set of scenarios SEED-SET generated changed drastically. This tells us the evaluation strategy responds well to the preferences of the user,” Parashar says.

To measure how useful SEED-SET would be in practice, the researchers will need to conduct a user study to see if the scenarios it generates help with real decision-making.

In addition to running such a study, the researchers plan to explore the use of more efficient models that can scale up to larger problems with more criteria, such as evaluating LLM decision-making.

This research was funded, in part, by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/uo4xFUj

Preview tool helps makers visualize 3D-printed objects

Designers, makers, and others often use 3D printing to rapidly prototype a range of functional objects, from movie props to medical devices. Accurate print previews are essential so users know a fabricated object will perform as expected.

But previews generated by most 3D-printing software focus on function rather than aesthetics. A printed object may end up with a different color, texture, or shading than the user expected, resulting in multiple reprints that waste time, effort, and material.

To help users envision how a fabricated object will look, researchers from MIT and elsewhere developed an easy-to-use preview tool that puts appearance first.

Users upload a screenshot of the object from their 3D-printing software, along with a single image of the print material. From these inputs, the system automatically generates a rendering of how the fabricated object is likely to look.

The artificial intelligence-powered system, called VisiPrint, is designed to work with a range of 3D-printing software and can handle any material example. It considers not only the color of the material, but also gloss, translucency, and how nuances of the fabrication process affect the object’s appearance.

Such aesthetics-focused previews could be especially useful in areas like dentistry, by helping clinicians ensure temporary crowns and bridges match the appearance of a patient’s teeth, or in architecture, to aid designers in assessing the visual impact of models.

“3D printing can be a very wasteful process. Some studies estimate that as much as a third of the material used goes straight to the landfill, often from prototypes the user ends of discarding. To make 3D printing more sustainable, we want to reduce the number of tries it takes to get the prototype you want. The user shouldn’t have to try out every printing material they have before they settle on a design,” says Maxine Perroni-Scharf, an electrical engineering and computer science (EECS) graduate student and lead author of a paper on VisiPrint.

She is joined on the paper by Faraz Faruqi, a fellow EECS graduate student; Raul Hernandez, an MIT undergraduate; SooYeon Ahn, a graduate student at the Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology; Szymon Rusinkiewicz, a professor of computer science at Princeton University; William Freeman, the Thomas and Gerd Perkins Professor of EECS at MIT and a member of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL); and senior author Stefanie Mueller, an associate professor of EECS and Mechanical Engineering at MIT, and a member of CSAIL. The research will be presented at the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Accurate aesthetics

The researchers focused on fused deposition modeling (FDM), the most common type of 3D printing. In FDM, print material filament is melted and then squirted through a nozzle to fabricate an object one layer at a time.

Generating accurate aesthetic previews is challenging because the melting and extrusion process can change the appearance of a material, as can the height of each deposited layer and the path the nozzle follows during fabrication.

VisiPrint uses two AI models that work together to overcome those challenges.

The VisiPrint preview is based on two inputs: a screenshot of the digital design from a user’s 3D-printing software (called “slicer” software), and an image of the print material, which can be taken from an online source or captured from a printed sample.

From these inputs, a computer vision model extracts features from the material sample that are important for the object’s appearance.

It feeds those features to a generative AI model that computes the geometry and structure of the object, while incorporating the so-called “slicing” pattern the nozzle will follow as it extrudes each layer.

The key to the researchers’ approach is a special conditioning method. This involves carefully adjusting the inner workings of the model to guide it, so it follows the slicing pattern and obeys the constraints of the 3D-printing process.

Their conditioning method utilizes a depth map that preserves the shape and shading of the object, along with a map of the edges that reflects the internal contours and structural boundaries.

“If you don’t have the right balance of these two things, you could use up with bad geometry or an incorrect slicing pattern. We had to be careful to combine them in the right way,” Perroni-Scharf says.

A user-focused system

The team also produced an easy-to-use interface where one can upload the required images and evaluate the preview.

The VisiPrint interface enables more advanced makers to adjust multiple settings, such as the influence of certain colors on the final appearance.

In the end, the aesthetic preview is intended to complement the functional preview generated by slicer software, since VisiPrint does not estimate printability, mechanical feasibility, or likelihood of failure.

To evaluate VisiPrint, the researchers conducted a user study that asked participants to compare the system to other approaches. Nearly all participants said it provided better overall appearance as well as more textural similarity with printed objects.

In addition, the VisiPrint preview process took about a minute on average, which was more than twice as fast as any competing method.

“VisiPrint really shined when compared to other AI interfaces. If you give a more general AI model the same screenshots, it might randomly change the shape or use the wrong slicing pattern because it had no direct conditioning,” she says.

In the future, the researchers want to address artifacts that can occur when model previews have extremely fine details. They also want to add features that allow users to optimize parts of the printing process beyond color of the material.

“It is important to think about the way that we fabricate objects. We need to continue striving to develop methods that reduce waste. To that end, this marriage of AI with the physical making process is an exciting area of future work,” Perroni-Scharf says.

“‘What you see is what you get’ has been the main thing that made desktop publishing ‘happen’ in the 1980s, as it allowed users to get what they wanted at first try. It is time to get WYSIWYG for 3D printing as well. VisiPrint is a great step in this direction,” says Patrick Baudisch, a professor of computer science at the Hasso Plattner Institute, who was not involved with this work.

This research was funded, in part, by an MIT Morningside Academy for Design Fellowship and an MIT MathWorks Fellowship.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/nC3YmkK

Turning muscles into motors gives static organs new life

What if a technology could reanimate parts of the body that have lost their connection to the brain — like a bladder that can no longer empty due to a spinal cord injury, or intestines that can’t push food forward due to Crohn’s disease? What if this technology could also send sensations such as hunger or touch back to the brain?

New MIT research offers a glimpse into this future. In an open-access study published today in Nature Communications, the researchers introduce a novel myoneural actuator (MNA) that reprograms living muscles into fatigue-resistant, computer-controlled motors that can be implanted inside the body to restore movement in organs.

“We’ve built an interface that leverages natural pathways used by the nervous system so that we can seamlessly control organs in the body, while also enabling the transmission of sensory feedback to the brain,” says Hugh Herr, senior author of the study, a professor of media arts and sciences at the MIT Media Lab, co-director of the K. Lisa Yang Center for Bionics, and an associate member of the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT. The study was co-led by Herr’s postdoc Guillermo Herrera-Arcos and former postdoc Hyungeun Song.

By repurposing existing muscle in the body, the researchers have developed the first “living” implant that uses rewired sensory nerves to revive paralyzed organs — which may present a new genre of medicine, where a person’s own tissue becomes the hardware.

Rewiring the brain-body interface

Many scientists have toiled to restore function in paralyzed organs, but it’s extremely challenging to design a technology that both communicates with the nervous system and doesn't fatigue over time. Some have tried to insert miniaturized actuators — small machines that can power bionic limbs — into the body. However, Herrera-Arcos says, “it’s hard to make actuators at the centimeter level, and they aren’t very efficient.” Others have focused on creating muscle tissue in the lab, but building muscles cell by cell is time-intensive and far from ready for human use.

Herr’s team tried something different.

“We engineered existing muscles to become an actuator, or motor, that reinstates motion in organs,” says Song.

To do this, the researchers had to navigate the delicate dynamics within the nervous system. The actuator would have to interface with the nervous system to work properly, but it must also somehow evade the brain’s control. “You don’t want the brain to consciously control the muscle actuator because you want the actuator to automatically control an organ, like the heart,” explains Herrera-Arcos. Establishing a computer-controlled muscle to move organs could ensure automatic function and also bypass damaged brain pathways.

Incorporating motor neurons into the actuator may help generate movement, but these neurons are directly controlled by the brain. “Sensory neurons, however, are wired to receive, not to command,” explains Song. “We thought we could leverage this dynamic and reroute motor signals through sensory fibers, making a computer — rather than the brain — the muscle’s new command center.”

To achieve this, sensory nerves would need to fuse fluidly with muscle, and scientists had not yet determined if this was possible. Remarkably, when the team replaced motor nerves in rodent muscle with sensory ones, “the sensory nerves re-innervated the muscles and formed functional synapses. It’s a tremendous discovery,” says Herrera-Arcos.

Sensory neurons not only enabled the use of a digital controller, but also helped curb muscle fatigue — increasing fatigue resistance in rodent muscle by 260 percent compared to native muscles. That’s because muscle fatigue depends largely on the diameter of the axons, or cable-like projections that innervate muscles. Motor neuron axons vary greatly in size, and when a motor nerve is electrically stimulated, the largest axons fire first — exhausting the muscle quickly. However, sensory axons are all nearly the same size, so the signal is broadcast more evenly across muscle fibers, avoiding fatigue, explains Herrera-Arcos.

Designing a biohybrid system

They combined all of these elements into a fatigue-resistant biohybrid motor called a myoneural actuator (MNA). By wrapping their actuator around a paralyzed intestine in a rodent, the researchers reinstated the organ’s squeezing motion. They also successfully controlled rodent calf muscles in an experiment designed to mimic residual muscle in human lower-limb amputations. Importantly, the MNA system transmitted sensory signals to the brain. “This suggests that our technology could seamlessly link organs to the brain. For example, we might be able to make a paralyzed stomach relay hunger,” explains Song.

Bringing their MNA to clinic will require further testing in larger animal models, and eventually, humans. But if it passes the regulatory gauntlet, their system could pave a smoother and safer path toward reviving static organs. Implanting MNAs would require a surgery that is already commonplace in clinic, the researchers say, and their system might be simpler and safer to implement than mechanical devices or organ transplants that introduce foreign material into the body.

The team is hopeful that their new technology could improve the lives of millions living with organ dysfunctions. “Today’s solutions are mostly synthetic: pacemakers and other mechanical assist devices. A living muscle actuator implanted alongside a weakened organ would be part of the body itself. That is a category of medicine different from anything seen in clinic,” explains Herrera-Arcos.

Song says that skin is of special interest. “Hypothetically, we could wrap MNAs around skin grafts to relay tactile feedback, such as strain or tension, which is currently missing for users of prostheses.” Their technology could even augment virtual reality systems, too. “The idea is that, if we couple the MNA system to skin and muscles, a person could feel what their virtual avatar is touching even though their real body isn’t moving,” says Song.

“Our research is on the brink of giving new life to various parts and extensions of the body,” adds Herrera-Arcos. “It’s exciting to think that our system could enhance human potential in ways that once only belonged to the realm of science fiction.”

This research was funded, in part, by the Yang Tan Collective at MIT, K. Lisa Yang Center for Bionics at MIT, Nakos Family Bionics Research Fund at MIT, and the Carl and Ruth Shapiro Foundation.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/bVg2R9d

Two physicists and a curious host walk into a studio…

This March on The Curiosity Desk, GBH’s daily science show with host Edgar B. Herwick III, MIT scientists dropped by to address the questions: “How close are we to observing the dark universe?” (Thursday, March 12 episode) and “Is Earth prepared for asteroids?” (Thursday, March 26 episode).

Up first, Prof. Nergis Mavalvala, dean of the MIT School of Science, and Prof. Salvatore Vitale joined the host live in studio to talk about the science behind the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) and how LIGO has provided the ability to observe the universe in ways that have never been done before.

In addition to learning something new, Mavalvala explained how experimenting delivers an added piece of excitement: “pushing the technology, the precision of the instrument, requires you to be very inventive. There’s almost nothing in these experiments that you can go buy off a shelf. Everything you’re designing, everything is from scratch. You’re meeting very stringent requirements.”

Herwick likened how they might tweak or tinker with the experiment to souping up a car engine, and the LIGO scientists nodded – adding that in the most complex experiments, each bite-sized part on its own works well, and it’s the interfaces between them that scientists must get right.

While there, the two long-time colleagues also took a detour to explain how in physics experimentalists benefit from the work of theorists and vice versa. Mavalvala, whose work focuses on building the world’s most precise instruments to study physical phenomena, described the synergy between ideas that come from theory (work that Vitale does) and how you measure. (No, they assure Herwick, they don’t get into a lot of fights.)

In fact, it’s fantastic to have people from both worlds at MIT, said Vitale.  Mavalvala agreed. “One of the things that’s really important about theory in science is that ultimately, in physics especially, it’s a bunch of math. And the important thing that you have to ask is, ‘does nature really behave that way?’ And how do you answer that question? You have to go out and measure. You have to go observe nature,” said Mavalvala.

As scientists fine-tune the gravitational wave detectors, they will inform what data are collected, what astrophysical objects they might find or hope to find – and the search for certain fainter, farther away, or more exotic objects can inform what enhancements they prioritize.

But what if I’m not interested in any of that, asked Herwick? Why should I care? 

“To me, it falls in the category of for the betterment of humankind. You never know what is going to be useful. A lot of fundamental research was very far at the beginning from what turned out to be fundamental applications,” said Vitale, adding, “What they do on the instrument side has already now very important applications.”

Mavalvala was unequivocal, underscoring how pursuing curiosity is put to good use:

“When you’re making instruments that achieve that kind of precision, you’re inventing new technologies. [With LIGO] We’ve invented vibration isolation technologies to keep our mirrors really still. We’ve invented lasers that are quieter than any that were ever made before. We’ve invented photonic techniques that are allowing us to make applications even to far off things like quantum computing. 

“So, this is one of the beauties of fundamental discovery science. A, you’ll discover something. But B you’ll be doing two things: you’ll be inventing the technologies of the future, and you’ll be training the generations of scientists who may go off to do completely different things, but this is what inspires them.”

Watch the full conversation below and on YouTube:

 

Planetary defense

Turning to objects beyond Earth – specifically, asteroids – Associate Professor Julien de Wit, along with research scientists Artem Burdanov and Saverio Cambioni, joined Herwick at the Curiosity Desk later in the month. They talked about their ongoing research to identify smaller asteroids (about the size of a school bus) using the James Webb Space Telescope and why planetary defense goes beyond thinking about the massive asteroids featured in movies like Armageddon. Notably, a lot of technology on earth depends on satellites, and asteroids pose the biggest threat to satellites.    

“Dinosaurs didn’t need to care about an asteroid hitting the moon. Humanity a century ago didn’t care. Now, if [an asteroid] hits the moon, a lot of debris will be expelled and all those particles – big and small – they will affect the fleet of satellites around Earth. That’s a big potential problem, so we need to take that into account in our future,” said Burdanov.

There’s also a potential upside to being better able to detect and potentially “capture” asteroids, explained de Wit, all of it benefitted by new instruments. “It’s really an asteroid revolution going on… Our situational awareness of what’s out there is really about to change dramatically.”

He explains that one dream is to mine asteroids themselves for material to build or power next generation technologies or stations in space. “The way to reliably move into space is to use resources from space. We can’t just move stuff to build a full city. We use stuff from space.”

Echoing the sentiments expressed earlier in the month by MIT’s dean of science, the trio of asteroid explorers also described how the pursuits of planetary scientists can lead to unexpected rewards along the way. “We are swimming in an era that is data rich, and so what we do in our group and at MIT is mine that data to reveal the universe like never before,” says de Wit. “Revealing new populations of asteroids, new populations of planets, and making sense of our universe like we have never done.”

Watch the full conversation below and on the GBH YouTube channel: 

Tune in to the Curiosity Desk some Thursdays to hear from MIT researchers as they visit Herwick and the production team. 

de MIT News https://ift.tt/Q2kP0ml

Climate change may produce “fast-food” phytoplankton

We are what we eat. And in the ocean, most life-forms source their food from phytoplankton. These microscopic, plant-like algae are the primary food source for krill, sea snails, some small fish, and jellyfish, which in turn feed larger marine animals that are prey for the ocean’s top predators, including humans.

Now MIT scientists are finding that phytoplankton's composition, and the basic diet of the ocean, will shift significantly with climate change.

In an open-access study appearing today in the journal Nature Climate Change, the team reports that as sea surface temperatures rise over the next century, phytoplankton in polar regions will adapt to be less rich in proteins, heavier in carbohydrates, and lower in nutrients overall.

The conclusions are based on results from the team’s new model, which simulates the composition of phytoplankton in response to changes in ocean temperature, circulation, and sea ice coverage. In a scenario in which humans continue to emit greenhouse gases through the year 2100, the team found that changing ocean conditions, particularly in the polar regions, will shift phytoplankton’s balance of proteins to carbohydrates and lipids by approximately 20 percent. The researchers analyzed observations from the past several decades, and already have found a signature of this change in the real world.

“We’re moving in the poles toward a sort of fast-food ocean,” says lead author and MIT postdoc Shlomit Sharoni. “Based on this prediction, the nutritional composition of the surface ocean will look very different by the end of the century.”

The study’s MIT co-authors are Mick Follows, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, and Oliver Jahn; along with Keisuke Inomura of the University of Rhode Island; Zoe Finkel, Andrew Irwin, and Mohammad Amirian of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada; and Erwan Monier of the University of California at Davis.

Nutritional information

Phytoplankton drift through the upper, sun-lit layers of the ocean. Like plants on land, the marine microalgae are photosynthetic. Their growth depends on light from the sun, carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and nutrients such as nitrogen and iron that well up from the deep ocean.

When studying how phytoplankton will respond to climate change, scientists have primarily focused on how rising ocean temperatures will affect phytoplankton populations. Whether and how the plankton’s composition will change is less well-understood.

“There’s been an awareness that the nutritional value of phytoplankton can shift with climate change,” says Sharoni, “But there has been very little work in directly addressing that question.”

She and her colleagues set out to understand how ocean conditions influence phytoplankton macromolecular composition. Macromolecules are large molecules that are essential for life. The main types of macromolecules include proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids (the building blocks of DNA and RNA). Every form of life, including phytoplankton, is composed of a balance of macromolecules that helps it to survive in its particular environment.

“Nearly all the material in a living organism is in these broad molecular forms, each having a particular physiological function, depending on the circumstances that the organism finds itself in,” says Follows, a professor in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences.

An unbalanced diet

In their new study, the researchers first looked at how today’s ocean conditions influence phytoplankton’s macromolecular composition. The team used data from lab experiments carried out by their collaborators at Dalhousie. These experiments revealed ways in which phytoplankton’s balance of macromolecules, such as proteins to carbohydrates, shifted in response to changes in water temperature and the availability of light and nutrients.

With these lab-based data, the group developed a quantitative model that simulates how plankton in the lab would readjust its balance of proteins to carbohydrates under different light and nutrient conditions. Sharoni and Inomura then paired this new model with an established model of ocean circulation and dynamics developed previously at MIT. With this modeling combination, they simulated how phytoplankton composition shifts in response to ocean conditions in different parts of the world and under different climate scenarios.

The team first modeled today’s current climate conditions. Consistent with observations, their model predicts that that a little more than half of the average phytoplankton cell today is composed of proteins. The rest is a mix of carbohydrates and lipids.

Interestingly, in polar regions, phytoplankton are slightly more protein-rich. At the poles, the cover of sea ice limits the amount of sunlight phytoplankton can absorb. The researchers surmise that phytoplankton may have adapted by making more light-harvesting proteins to help the organisms efficiently absorb the weak sunlight.

However, when they modeled a future climate change scenario, the team found a significant shift in phytoplankton composition. They simulated a scenario in which humans continue to emit greenhouse gases through the year 2100. In this scenario, the ocean sea surface temperatures will rise by 3 degrees Celsius, substantially reducing sea ice coverage. Warmer temperatures will also limit the ocean’s circulation, as well as the amount of nutrients that can circulate up from the deep ocean.

Under these conditions, the model predicts that the population of phytoplankton growth in polar regions will increase significantly, consistent with earlier studies. Uniquely, this model predicts that phytoplankton in polar regions will shift from a protein-rich to a carb- and lipid-heavy composition. They found that plankton will not need as much light-harvesting protein, since less sea ice will make sunlight more easily available for the organisms to absorb. Total protein levels in these polar phytoplankton will decline by up to 30 percent, with a corresponding increase in the contribution of carbs and lipids.

It’s unclear what impact a larger population of carb- and lipid-heavy phytoplankton may have on the rest of the marine food web. While some organisms may be stressed by a reduction in protein, others that make lipid stores to survive through the winter might thrive.

The team also simulated phytoplankton in subtropical, higher-latitude regions. In these ocean areas, it’s expected that phytoplankton populations will decline by 50 percent. And the team’s modeling shows that their composition will also shift.

With warmer temperatures, the ocean’s circulation will slow down, limiting the amount of nutrients that can upwell from the deep ocean. In response, subtropical phytoplankton may have to find ways to live at deeper depths, to strike a balance between getting enough sunlight and nutrients. Under these conditions, the organisms will likely shift to a slightly more protein-rich composition, making use of the same photosynthetic proteins that their polar counterparts will require less of.

On balance, given the projected changes in phytoplankton populations with climate change, their average composition around the world will shift to a more carb-heavy, low-nutrient composition.

The researchers went a step further and found that their modeling agrees with available small set of actual phytoplankton field samples that other scientists previously collected from Arctic and Antarctic regions. These samples showed compositions of phytoplankton have become  more carb- and lipid-heavy over the past few decades, as the team’s model predicts under climate warming.

“In these regions, you can already see climate change, because sea ice is already melting,” Sharoni explains. “And our model shows that proteins in polar plankton have been declining, while carbs and lipids are increasing.”

“It turns out that climate change is accelerated in the Arctic, and we have data showing that the composition of phytoplankton has already responded,” Follows adds. “The main message is: The caloric content at the base of the marine food web is already changing. And it’s not a clear story as to how this change will transmit through the food web.”

This work was supported, in part, by the Simons Foundation.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/DqkTCMF

Climate change may produce “fast-food” phytoplankton

We are what we eat. And in the ocean, most life-forms source their food from phytoplankton. These microscopic, plant-like algae are the primary food source for krill, sea snails, some small fish, and jellyfish, which in turn feed larger marine animals that are prey for the ocean’s top predators, including humans.

Now MIT scientists are finding that phytoplankton's composition, and the basic diet of the ocean, will shift significantly with climate change.

In an open-access study appearing today in the journal Nature Climate Change, the team reports that as sea surface temperatures rise over the next century, phytoplankton in polar regions will adapt to be less rich in proteins, heavier in carbohydrates, and lower in nutrients overall.

The conclusions are based on results from the team’s new model, which simulates the composition of phytoplankton in response to changes in ocean temperature, circulation, and sea ice coverage. In a scenario in which humans continue to emit greenhouse gases through the year 2100, the team found that changing ocean conditions, particularly in the polar regions, will shift phytoplankton’s balance of proteins to carbohydrates and lipids by approximately 20 percent. The researchers analyzed observations from the past several decades, and already have found a signature of this change in the real world.

“We’re moving in the poles toward a sort of fast-food ocean,” says lead author and MIT postdoc Shlomit Sharoni. “Based on this prediction, the nutritional composition of the surface ocean will look very different by the end of the century.”

The study’s MIT co-authors are Mick Follows, Stephanie Dutkiewicz, and Oliver Jahn; along with Keisuke Inomura of the University of Rhode Island; Zoe Finkel, Andrew Irwin, and Mohammad Amirian of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada; and Erwan Monier of the University of California at Davis.

Nutritional information

Phytoplankton drift through the upper, sun-lit layers of the ocean. Like plants on land, the marine microalgae are photosynthetic. Their growth depends on light from the sun, carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and nutrients such as nitrogen and iron that well up from the deep ocean.

When studying how phytoplankton will respond to climate change, scientists have primarily focused on how rising ocean temperatures will affect phytoplankton populations. Whether and how the plankton’s composition will change is less well-understood.

“There’s been an awareness that the nutritional value of phytoplankton can shift with climate change,” says Sharoni, “But there has been very little work in directly addressing that question.”

She and her colleagues set out to understand how ocean conditions influence phytoplankton macromolecular composition. Macromolecules are large molecules that are essential for life. The main types of macromolecules include proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids (the building blocks of DNA and RNA). Every form of life, including phytoplankton, is composed of a balance of macromolecules that helps it to survive in its particular environment.

“Nearly all the material in a living organism is in these broad molecular forms, each having a particular physiological function, depending on the circumstances that the organism finds itself in,” says Follows, a professor in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences.

An unbalanced diet

In their new study, the researchers first looked at how today’s ocean conditions influence phytoplankton’s macromolecular composition. The team used data from lab experiments carried out by their collaborators at Dalhousie. These experiments revealed ways in which phytoplankton’s balance of macromolecules, such as proteins to carbohydrates, shifted in response to changes in water temperature and the availability of light and nutrients.

With these lab-based data, the group developed a quantitative model that simulates how plankton in the lab would readjust its balance of proteins to carbohydrates under different light and nutrient conditions. Sharoni and Inomura then paired this new model with an established model of ocean circulation and dynamics developed previously at MIT. With this modeling combination, they simulated how phytoplankton composition shifts in response to ocean conditions in different parts of the world and under different climate scenarios.

The team first modeled today’s current climate conditions. Consistent with observations, their model predicts that that a little more than half of the average phytoplankton cell today is composed of proteins. The rest is a mix of carbohydrates and lipids.

Interestingly, in polar regions, phytoplankton are slightly more protein-rich. At the poles, the cover of sea ice limits the amount of sunlight phytoplankton can absorb. The researchers surmise that phytoplankton may have adapted by making more light-harvesting proteins to help the organisms efficiently absorb the weak sunlight.

However, when they modeled a future climate change scenario, the team found a significant shift in phytoplankton composition. They simulated a scenario in which humans continue to emit greenhouse gases through the year 2100. In this scenario, the ocean sea surface temperatures will rise by 3 degrees Celsius, substantially reducing sea ice coverage. Warmer temperatures will also limit the ocean’s circulation, as well as the amount of nutrients that can circulate up from the deep ocean.

Under these conditions, the model predicts that the population of phytoplankton growth in polar regions will increase significantly, consistent with earlier studies. Uniquely, this model predicts that phytoplankton in polar regions will shift from a protein-rich to a carb- and lipid-heavy composition. They found that plankton will not need as much light-harvesting protein, since less sea ice will make sunlight more easily available for the organisms to absorb. Total protein levels in these polar phytoplankton will decline by up to 30 percent, with a corresponding increase in the contribution of carbs and lipids.

It’s unclear what impact a larger population of carb- and lipid-heavy phytoplankton may have on the rest of the marine food web. While some organisms may be stressed by a reduction in protein, others that make lipid stores to survive through the winter might thrive.

The team also simulated phytoplankton in subtropical, higher-latitude regions. In these ocean areas, it’s expected that phytoplankton populations will decline by 50 percent. And the team’s modeling shows that their composition will also shift.

With warmer temperatures, the ocean’s circulation will slow down, limiting the amount of nutrients that can upwell from the deep ocean. In response, subtropical phytoplankton may have to find ways to live at deeper depths, to strike a balance between getting enough sunlight and nutrients. Under these conditions, the organisms will likely shift to a slightly more protein-rich composition, making use of the same photosynthetic proteins that their polar counterparts will require less of.

On balance, given the projected changes in phytoplankton populations with climate change, their average composition around the world will shift to a more carb-heavy, low-nutrient composition.

The researchers went a step further and found that their modeling agrees with available small set of actual phytoplankton field samples that other scientists previously collected from Arctic and Antarctic regions. These samples showed compositions of phytoplankton have become  more carb- and lipid-heavy over the past few decades, as the team’s model predicts under climate warming.

“In these regions, you can already see climate change, because sea ice is already melting,” Sharoni explains. “And our model shows that proteins in polar plankton have been declining, while carbs and lipids are increasing.”

“It turns out that climate change is accelerated in the Arctic, and we have data showing that the composition of phytoplankton has already responded,” Follows adds. “The main message is: The caloric content at the base of the marine food web is already changing. And it’s not a clear story as to how this change will transmit through the food web.”

This work was supported, in part, by the Simons Foundation.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/fD6Il0v

Leading with rigor, kindness, and care

Professor Sara Prescott embodies the kind of mentorship every graduate student hopes to find: grounded in scientific rigor, guided by kindness, and defined by a deep commitment to well-being. Her approach reflects a simple but powerful belief that transformative mentorship is not only about advancing research, but about cultivating confidence, belonging, and resilience in the next generation of scholars.

A member of the 2025–27 Committed to Caring cohort, Prescott exemplifies the program’s spirit, which honors faculty who go above and beyond in nurturing both the intellectual and personal development of MIT’s graduate students.

Prescott is the Pfizer Inc. - Gerald D. Laubach Career Development Professor in the MIT departments of Biology and Brain and Cognitive Sciences, and an investigator at the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory. Her research addresses fundamental questions in body-brain communication, with a focus on lung biology, early-life adversity, women’s health, and the impacts of climate change on respiratory health.

A culture of compassion

Prescott’s mentoring philosophy begins with a focus on professional sustainability. “We cannot be effective scientists if we are unhappy or unhealthy outside of the lab,” she says. 

She pushes back against what she sees as an unhelpful narrative in academia. “There’s this idea that you must choose between a successful PhD or having a personal life. This is a false dichotomy, and a problematic attitude.” Instead, she reminds her mentees that “graduate school is a marathon, not a sprint,” encouraging them to place importance not only on their research, but also on their mental and physical well-being.

This set of values shines through within her lab climate as a whole. Students describe support for flexible scheduling and mental health leave, a willingness to reimburse meals during late-night lab sessions, and encouragement during stretches of experimental failure. In addition to these more technical supports, nominators also shared stories of Prescott engaging in the smaller details: prioritizing connection for her students, celebrating their milestones, organizing lab retreats, and fostering a culture where people feel valued beyond their productivity.

Students recognize Prescott as a safe haven within the often complex and challenging world of research. Joining Prescott’s lab was a turning point for one student who was recovering from a damaging prior mentorship experience. They arrived uncertain, struggling to trust faculty and questioning whether they belonged in science at all. Prescott met them with empathy and professionalism, offering patience and trust not just in their work, but in them as a person. They describe steady support that, over time, helped them “fall back in love with science” and envision a future they had nearly abandoned.

Prescott draws inspiration from the mentorship she received early in her career. As a trainee, she had mentors who helped her believe that she could succeed. Now in a mentoring role herself, she does her best to pass this sense of confidence on to her advisees.

She is intentional about creating space where students can grow without fear. From their very first meetings, one nominator wrote, Prescott emphasized that “graduate school is a place for learning and curiosity.” They never felt judged for not knowing something; instead, they were encouraged to ask questions, share ideas, and take intellectual risks. That environment, the student explained, allowed them to grow into their scientific identity with confidence.

Prescott reinforces this message often. Success, she tells students, grows from effort, learning, and persistence, rather than from fixed traits. When working with students, she does her best to reframe failure as part of the process, emphasizing its importance within the scientific journey. Through these avenues, she cultivates a lab culture where nominators are challenged to think boldly while feeling genuinely supported, and where her students are seen not only as researchers, but as whole people.

Advocacy beyond the bench

Prescott’s commitment to caring extends well beyond day-to-day lab work. Her nominators relate that she actively supports her students’ professional development, encouraging them to pursue writing projects, certificates, internships, leadership roles, and community engagement.

Nominators also highlight Prescott’s focus on supporting underserved communities within the field as a whole. Students highlight her involvement with Graduate Women in Biology (GwiBio), where she volunteered as a speaker for the “Glass Shards” series. Her talk “Failure as the Path to Success,” in which she candidly shared pivots and setbacks in her own career, was described as one of the organization’s most impactful sessions. 

Her dedication to inclusion is equally evident in her mentorship of scholars whose role in her lab is more temporary.  She welcomes international visiting scholars, temporary lab techs, and undergraduate interns in the MIT Summer Research Program. When one intern encountered barriers at their home institution, Prescott ensured they had a continued research home in her lab at MIT. These additional resources allowed them to complete their undergraduate thesis and graduate on time from their university.

Prescott says that she views mentorship as an evolving practice, regularly soliciting feedback from her students. Effective leadership, in her view, grows from mutual trust and open communication.

For many nominators, Prescott’s impact extends beyond their careers. “She has taught me what positive and supportive mentoring relationships look like,” one student reflected. “When I think about the type of mentor I want to be, I hope I can emulate the ways in which she supports and guides nominators to develop their scientific independence and confidence.”

In lifting up the people behind the science as thoughtfully as the science itself, Sara Prescott demonstrates that the most enduring legacy of a mentor is not only the discoveries from their lab, but the composure and courage their advisees carry forward.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/rf9wZub