A complicated future for a methane-cleansing molecule

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas that is second only to carbon dioxide in driving up global temperatures. But it doesn’t linger in the atmosphere for long thanks to molecules called hydroxyl radicals, which are known as the “atmosphere’s detergent” for their ability to break down methane. As the planet warms, however, it’s unclear how the air-cleaning agents will respond.

MIT scientists are now shedding some light on this. The team has developed a new model to study different processes that control how levels of hydroxyl radical will shift with warming temperatures.

They find that the picture is complicated. As temperatures increase, so too will water vapor in the atmosphere, which will in turn boost the molecule’s concentrations. But rising temperatures will also increase “biogenic volatile organic compound emissions” — gases that are naturally released by some plants and trees. These natural emissions can reduce hydroxyl radical and dampen water vapor’s boosting effect.

Specifically, the team finds that if the planet’s average temperatures rise by 2 degrees Celsius, the accompanying rise in water vapor will increase hydroxyl radical levels by about 9 percent. But the corresponding increase in biogenic emissions would in turn bring down hydroxyl radical levels by 6 percent. The final accounting could mean a small boost, of about 3 percent, in the atmosphere’s ability to break down methane and other chemical compounds as the planet warms.

“Hydroxyl radicals are important in determining the lifetime of methane and other reactive greenhouse gases, as well as gases that affect public health, including ozone and certain other air pollutants,” says study author Qindan Zhu, who led the work as a postdoc in MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences (EAPS).

“There’s a whole range of environmental reasons why we want to understand what’s going on with this molecule,” adds Arlene Fiore, the Peter H. Stone and Paola Malanotte Stone Professor in EAPS. “We want to make sure it’s around to chemically remove all these gases and pollutants.”

Fiore and Zhu’s new study appears today in the Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES). The study’s MIT co-authors include Jian Guan and Paolo Giani, along with Robert Pincus, Nicole Neumann, George Milly, and Clare Singer of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and the Columbia Climate School, and Brian Medeiros at the National Center for Atmospheric Research.

A natural neutralizer

The hydroxyl radical, known chemically as OH, is made up of one oxygen atom and one hydrogen atom, along with an unpaired electron. This configuration makes the molecule extremely reactive. Like a chemical vacuum cleaner, OH easily pulls an electron or hydrogen atom away from other molecules, breaking them down into weaker, more water-soluble forms. In this way, OH reduces a vast range of chemicals, including some air pollutants, pathogens, and ozone. And changes in OH are a powerful lever on methane.

“For methane, the reaction with OH is considered the most important loss pathway,” Zhu says. “About 90 percent of the methane that’s removed from the atmosphere is due to the reaction with OH.”

Indeed, it’s thanks to reactions with hydroxyl radical that methane can only stick around in the atmosphere for about a decade — far shorter than carbon dioxide, which can linger for 1,000 years or longer. But even as OH breaks down methane already in the atmosphere, more methane continues to accumulate. Rising methane concentrations, in addition to human-derived emissions of carbon dioxide, are driving global warming, and it’s unclear how OH’s methane-clearing power will keep up.

“The questions we’re exploring here are: What are the main processes that control OH concentrations? And how will OH respond to climate change?” Fiore says.

An aquaplanet’s air

For their study, the researchers developed a new model to simulate levels of OH in the atmosphere under a current global climate scenario, compared to a future warmer climate. Their model, dubbed “AquaChem,” is an expansion of a simplified model that is part of a suite of tools developed by the Community Earth System Model (CESM) project. The model that the team chose to build off is one that represents the Earth as a simplified “aquaplanet,” with an entirely ocean-covered surface.

Aquaplanet models allow scientists to study detailed interactions in the atmosphere in response to changes in surface temperatures, without having to also spend computing time and energy on simulating complex dynamics between the land, water, and polar ice caps.

To the aquaplanet model, Zhu added an atmospheric chemistry component that simulates detailed chemical reactions in the atmosphere consistent with the applied surface temperatures. The chemical reactions that she modeled represent those that are known to affect OH concentrations.

OH is primarily produced when ozone interacts with sunlight in the presence of water vapor. For instance, scientists have found that OH levels can vary depending certain anthropogenic and natural emissions, all of which Zhu incorporated separately and together into the AquaChem model in order to isolate the impact of each process on OH.

The emissions in particular include carbon monoxide, methane, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), some of which are emitted through human practices, and others that are given off by natural processes. One type of naturally-derived VOCs are “biogenic” emissions — gases, such as isoprene, that some plants and trees emit through tiny pores called stomata during transpiration.

Into the AquaChem model, Zhu plugged in data that were available for each type of emissions from the year 2000 — a year that is generally considered to represent the current climate in a simplified form. She set the aquaplanet’s sea surface temperatures to the zonal annual mean of that year, and found that the model accurately reproduced the major sensitivities of OH chemistry to the underlying chemical processing as simulated in a more complex chemistry-climate model.

Then, Zhu ran the model under a second, globally warming scenario. She set the planet’s sea surface temperatures to warm by 2 degrees Celsius (a warming that is likely to occur unless global anthropogenic carbon emissions are mitigated). The team looked at how this warming would affect the various types of emissions and chemical processes, and how these changes would ultimately affect levels of OH in the atmosphere.

In the end, they found the two biggest drivers of OH levels were rising water vapor and biogenic emissions. They found that global warming would increase the amount of water vapor to the atmosphere, which in turn would boost production of OH by 9 percent. However, this same degree of warming would also increase biogenic emissions such as isoprene, which reacts with and breaks down OH, bringing down its levels by 6 percent.

The team recognizes that there are many other factors that affect the response of isoprene emissions to surface warming. Rising CO₂, not considered in this study, may dampen this temperature-driven response. Of all the factors that can shift OH levels under global warming, the researchers caution that biogenic emissions are the most uncertain, even though they appear to have a large influence. Going forward, the scientists plan to update AquaChem to continue studying how biogenic emissions, as well as other processes and climate scenarios, could sway OH concentrations.

“We know that changes in atmospheric OH, even of a few percent, can actually matter for interpreting how methane might accumulate in the atmosphere,” Zhu says. “Understanding future trends of OH will allow us to determine future trends of methane.”

This work was supported, in part, by Spark Climate Solutions and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

de MIT News https://ift.tt/Swm3WqF

3 Questions: Communicating about climate, in audio and beyond

Since her first journalism fellowship covering energy and the environment at the NPR station in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Madison Goldberg has been drawn to science communication and audio storytelling. Now, after reporting on topics from solar storms to sewer systems to cryptography, she’s bringing her passions to MIT as the new host of the Institute’s climate change podcast.

Launched in 2019 as TILclimate, the show began its eighth season this year with a new name: Ask MIT Climate. But the podcast’s mission remains the same: teaming up with scientists and subject matter experts to bring listeners clear, accessible information on climate change topics in 15 minutes or less.

In this interview, Goldberg talks about her path to science communication, the ideas she thinks it’s important for climate communicators to convey, and what makes MIT an exciting place to share knowledge with the world.

Q: Did you always know that you wanted to be a science communicator? 

A: I didn’t! My first love in science was astronomy. I grew up looking at the stars a lot, and I was very lucky to do an internship in high school at UC Santa Cruz with a professor in their astronomy department. Space kind of puts everything in the biggest possible perspective, and for me, that’s a very calming thing.

And then in college, I wanted to do something closer to home, so to speak. I found that Earth science was very exciting to learn about, because pretty much all the sciences are somehow involved. You know, you’ve got chemistry, biology, physics ... everything all rolled into one. Also, I still got to tap into a lot of what I loved about astronomy, in terms of exploring deep time and big scales. And I was very motivated by a lot of the problems in Earth and climate science, because they tie so closely to people’s lives.

I expected to continue with research, but I discovered that what was especially compelling to me was learning about this stuff and then talking to people about it. And in my senior year of college I learned that science communication, and science journalism, was a field that you could be in. 

I took a science podcasting course that year — which I still can’t believe even existed — and I got my first taste of interviewing people and working in audio, which was just incredible. I had loved podcasts for so long, and so the medium felt really familiar.

Q: What is important for science communicators to convey about climate change?

A: One of the ideas that I try to always keep in mind, and that I think is really important to convey, is that climate change affects every single aspect of our lives. And we need to communicate about it accordingly.

I think it’s crucial to consider the ways climate change intertwines with all these other realms of people’s experiences; it affects where we live, it affects what we eat, it affects the economy, it affects our health. Approaching it in isolation doesn’t seem to be the most productive framework. As communicators, we have a responsibility to listen and learn and talk about all these many and varied ways that climate change shows up in people’s lives.

This idea of things intertwining also reminds me of a really central theme in Ask MIT Climate: that working towards climate solutions not only allows us to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, but it can also help make people’s lives better in other ways. And we get to think expansively about the future we want to build.

Q: What makes MIT an exciting place to be engaged in climate communication?

A: The folks that I've talked to at MIT are just so kind and generous with their time. And these people are so busy! They have so much on their plates, and yet, somehow, even when I have a million follow-up questions, extremely prominent researchers will hop on a Zoom or exchange emails to answer them. I feel so lucky to be part of this community.

Related to what I mentioned earlier, I also appreciate the interdisciplinary climate work that happens at MIT. Tackling climate change is a generational challenge, and it requires inputs from all kinds of fields. And at MIT we have, for example, the Climate Project, the Climate Policy Center, the Center for Sustainability Science and Strategy, the Living Climate Futures Lab — all of these ways to approach the issue and bring folks into the conversation who have different expertise, experiences, and perspectives. I think it’s really special to be at MIT, to see that happen in real-time, and to see students, faculty, and staff working to bridge across subject matter boundaries.

Above all, I’ve been shown such generosity, and I’m so grateful. I feel like I can never express enough gratitude for the people inside and outside of MIT who have spoken to me about their work and about their lives. All I can hope to do is to communicate that information faithfully. Because I think there’s a huge number of people who are curious about climate change and what we can do about it, and who want to learn.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/QmHydtX

3 Questions: Communicating about climate, in audio and beyond

Since her first journalism fellowship covering energy and the environment at the NPR station in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Madison Goldberg has been drawn to science communication and audio storytelling. Now, after reporting on topics from solar storms to sewer systems to cryptography, she’s bringing her passions to MIT as the new host of the Institute’s climate change podcast.

Launched in 2019 as TILclimate, the show began its eighth season this year with a new name: Ask MIT Climate. But the podcast’s mission remains the same: teaming up with scientists and subject matter experts to bring listeners clear, accessible information on climate change topics in 15 minutes or less.

In this interview, Goldberg talks about her path to science communication, the ideas she thinks it’s important for climate communicators to convey, and what makes MIT an exciting place to share knowledge with the world.

Q: Did you always know that you wanted to be a science communicator? 

A: I didn’t! My first love in science was astronomy. I grew up looking at the stars a lot, and I was very lucky to do an internship in high school at UC Santa Cruz with a professor in their astronomy department. Space kind of puts everything in the biggest possible perspective, and for me, that’s a very calming thing.

And then in college, I wanted to do something closer to home, so to speak. I found that Earth science was very exciting to learn about, because pretty much all the sciences are somehow involved. You know, you’ve got chemistry, biology, physics ... everything all rolled into one. Also, I still got to tap into a lot of what I loved about astronomy, in terms of exploring deep time and big scales. And I was very motivated by a lot of the problems in Earth and climate science, because they tie so closely to people’s lives.

I expected to continue with research, but I discovered that what was especially compelling to me was learning about this stuff and then talking to people about it. And in my senior year of college I learned that science communication, and science journalism, was a field that you could be in. 

I took a science podcasting course that year — which I still can’t believe even existed — and I got my first taste of interviewing people and working in audio, which was just incredible. I had loved podcasts for so long, and so the medium felt really familiar.

Q: What is important for science communicators to convey about climate change?

A: One of the ideas that I try to always keep in mind, and that I think is really important to convey, is that climate change affects every single aspect of our lives. And we need to communicate about it accordingly.

I think it’s crucial to consider the ways climate change intertwines with all these other realms of people’s experiences; it affects where we live, it affects what we eat, it affects the economy, it affects our health. Approaching it in isolation doesn’t seem to be the most productive framework. As communicators, we have a responsibility to listen and learn and talk about all these many and varied ways that climate change shows up in people’s lives.

This idea of things intertwining also reminds me of a really central theme in Ask MIT Climate: that working towards climate solutions not only allows us to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, but it can also help make people’s lives better in other ways. And we get to think expansively about the future we want to build.

Q: What makes MIT an exciting place to be engaged in climate communication?

A: The folks that I've talked to at MIT are just so kind and generous with their time. And these people are so busy! They have so much on their plates, and yet, somehow, even when I have a million follow-up questions, extremely prominent researchers will hop on a Zoom or exchange emails to answer them. I feel so lucky to be part of this community.

Related to what I mentioned earlier, I also appreciate the interdisciplinary climate work that happens at MIT. Tackling climate change is a generational challenge, and it requires inputs from all kinds of fields. And at MIT we have, for example, the Climate Project, the Climate Policy Center, the Center for Sustainability Science and Strategy, the Living Climate Futures Lab — all of these ways to approach the issue and bring folks into the conversation who have different expertise, experiences, and perspectives. I think it’s really special to be at MIT, to see that happen in real-time, and to see students, faculty, and staff working to bridge across subject matter boundaries.

Above all, I’ve been shown such generosity, and I’m so grateful. I feel like I can never express enough gratitude for the people inside and outside of MIT who have spoken to me about their work and about their lives. All I can hope to do is to communicate that information faithfully. Because I think there’s a huge number of people who are curious about climate change and what we can do about it, and who want to learn.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/a3qjCEV

Stamping high-res imagery onto everyday items to “reprogram” their appearance

Imagine a world where you could change the designs you see on bags, shirts, and walls whenever you want. Typical clothes would become customizable fashion pieces, while your humble abode could turn into a smart home. That’s the vision of scientists like MIT electrical engineering and computer science PhD student Yunyi Zhu ’20, MEng ’21: technology that can “reprogram” the appearance of personal accessories, home decor, and office items. 

At MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), she’s created clever hardware that can add, say, artwork to a sweater, then swap in a new illustration later. To do this, she coats items with an invisible ink called photochromic dye, which transforms into different colors when exposed to intense light. Her colleagues previously built a device called “PhotoChromeleon” that used a projector to activate this ink, but the system wasn’t portable, so Zhu built the LED-based tool “PortaChrome” to reprogram lower-resolution imagery on the go.

Zhu and her team now have the best of both worlds: a portable device called “ChromoLCD” that programs clear pictures onto T-shirts, tables, and whiteboards. It looks like a small printer on the outside, but inside, ChromoLCD combines the sharpness of liquid-crystal displays (LCDs) with the precision lighting of LEDs. The collective powers of these lights help users stamp designs onto flat surfaces (like walls) and soft ones (like clothes) after they’ve been coated with photochromic dye.

ChromoLCD can embed a digital rose onto a hoodie, for example. Once you’ve painted photochromic ink onto the surface you’d like to redesign, you upload your picture to the device via Bluetooth or USB port. Users can select and preview their designs from ChromoLCD’s display menu, then stamp the device onto their item. Within about 15 minutes, you’ll have a personalized piece, and if you’d like to change it, you can program a new design onto your object.

“We see ChromoLCD as a bridge between consumers and photochromic dyes,” says Zhu, who is also co-lead author on a paper presenting this work. “It’s basically a stamp, and it’s very easy to use. There are no alignment requirements, no 3D object texture creation. You just upload the image you’d like to put on your bag, place it on there, and then you’d have a personalized accessory.”

ChromoLCD showed it could add a personalized touch to accessories such as a handbag by stamping on colorful drawings of things like fish and flowers. It also embedded an augmented reality (AR) tag (much like a QR code) on a tiled kitchen counter, which linked to a cooking tutorial a user could watch while preparing a meal. The tool even reprogrammed a whiteboard to display high-resolution reference images, and could potentially turn any whiteboard into an interactive canvas that blends digital visuals with physical sketching.

Welcome to the light show

At its core, ChromoLCD is a tower of power. Its display screen sits atop a white shell, which houses a computer chip, a backlight made up of bright ultraviolet (UV) and red, green, and blue (RGB) LEDs, and an LCD panel. In other words, while ChromoLCD works its magic to customize an object, a light show takes place behind the scenes.

The system first produces a black-and-white video that outlines the brightness of particular pixels in the image you select. For example, a picture of a parrot will have some areas that are darker than others, such as the shadows cast under its wing. Then, a UV light darkens (or saturates) the dye on your object, followed by the RGB lights that brighten it up and color in each pixel. It’s kind of like when you open the shades in the morning — what starts as a blast of bright light soon becomes a more colorful visual. These lights are produced at precise frequencies that the LCD maps onto your target object.

Zhu and her colleagues note that these components are fairly easy to purchase, in case you want to make your own ChromoLCD at home. Recreating ChromoLCD could help you turn often-overlooked items into interactive displays that you can modify as you please. “A wall in your office can show your family’s pictures when you miss them, or perhaps a doormat can show a customized greeting for each of your guests,” says Zhu. “It’s sort of like turning the world into your canvas.”

What next?

Combined with PortaChrome and PhotoChromeleon, CSAIL researchers have developed systems that help us digitize our surroundings. The next step for them is to find a way to help with the creative process of what to put there. Currently, you still need to upload a picture or even create a texture image for a 3D object. With the recent advancements we’ve seen from AI in texture generation, though, users could make requests without as much effort. By simply turning on your phone’s camera (or wearing an AR helmet) and pointing it at a particular object, you could ask your generative system to “turn a cup into a medieval-style tankard.” Voilà: you’d have programmed drinkware.

In the meantime, Zhu and her colleagues are bringing photochromic material to larger surfaces by developing a reprogrammer in the shape of a wall-roller. The machine works much like painting a wall, allowing you to place larger designs onto a surface. CSAIL researchers are also exploring swiping and ironing motions, and even implementing their current technology into robots to help them communicate with humans and other machines. The machines would be able to essentially write what they’re doing onto a surface — for example, a Roomba vacuum could tell its robotic counterparts that it cleaned specific areas of a large floor by stamping a clearly displayed, high-resolution message on the ground.

Narges Pourjafarian, a postdoc at Northeastern University who wasn’t involved in the paper, says that ChromoLCD is more than a resolution upgrade over prior MIT projects. “It reframes monochromatic LCD panels as wavelength-selective fabrication tools, rather than merely display endpoints. This approach expands how we think about reprogrammable surface appearance, enabling high-resolution, reconfigurable graphics to be embedded directly into physical environments without the need for stationary projection enclosures. It opens a path toward compact, portable augmentation of garments, countertops, and shared surfaces.”

Zhu wrote the paper with six CSAIL affiliates. They are: MIT undergraduates Qingyuan Li (who is a co-lead author), Katherine Yan, Alex Luchianov, and Eden Hen; Harvard University graduate student and former visiting researcher Emily Guan; and MIT Associate Professor Stefanie Mueller, who is a CSAIL principal investigator and senior author on the work. The researchers will present their paper at the ACM International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/F2KOyTj

On algorithms, life, and learning

From enhancing international business logistics to freeing up more hospital beds to helping farmers, MIT Professor Dimitris Bertsimas SM ’87, PhD ’88 summarized how his work in operations research has helped drive real-world improvements, while delivering the 54th annual James R. Killian Faculty Achievement Award Lecture at MIT on Thursday, March 19.

Bertsimas also described how artificial intelligence is now being used in some of his scholarly projects and as a tool in MIT Open Learning efforts, which he currently directs — another facet of a highly productive and lauded career over four decades at the Institute. The Killian Award is the highest prize MIT gives its faculty.

“I have tried to improve the human condition,” Bertsimas said, summarizing the breadth of his work and the many applications to everyday living that he has found for it.

At MIT, Bertsimas is the vice provost for open learning, associate dean for online education and artificial intelligence, Boeing Leaders for Global Operations Professor of Management, and professor of operations research in the MIT Sloan School of Management. He also served as the inaugural faculty director of the master of business analytics program at MIT Sloan, and has held the position of associate dean of business analytics.

Bertsimas’ remarks encompassed both his past insights and his ongoing studies, as well as his current efforts to add AI to his research. Describing the concept of “robust optimization,” a highly influential approach that Bertsimas helped develop in the early 2000s, he explained how it has enabled, for instance, more reliable shipping through the Panama Canal. Other approaches to optimization aimed at getting more vessels through the canal every day — up to 48 — but would encounter significant problems at times. Bertsimas’ approach identified that 45 vessels a day was better — a slightly lower number, but one that “was always feasible,” he noted.

Over time, Bertsimas’ work has helped structure all kinds of solutions in business logistics; it has even been used for the allocation of school buses in Boston.

More recently, as Bertsimas explained in the lecture, he and his collaborators have been working with Hartford HealthCare in Connecticut on a wide range of issues, and are increasingly incorporating AI into the development of tools for diagnostics, among other things. On the optimization front, their research has suggested ways to reduce the average stay of a hospital patient, from 5.38 days to 4.93 days. In the main Hartford hospital they have studied, given the number of existing beds, that reduction has enabled more than 5,000 additional patient stays per year.

“It’s a very different ballgame,” Bertsimas said.

Bertsimas delivered his lecture, titled “Algorithms for Life: AI and Operations Research Transforming Healthcare, Education, and Agriculture,” to an audience of over 300 MIT community members in Huntington Hall (Room 10-250) on campus.

The award was established in 1971 to honor James Killian, whose distinguished career included serving as MIT’s 10th president, from 1948 to 1959, and subsequently as chair of the MIT Corporation, from 1959 to 1971.

“Professor Bertsimas’ scholarly contributions are both extensive and groundbreaking,” said Roger Levy, chair of the MIT faculty and a professor in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, while making introductory remarks. “He’s one of the rare individuals who has made significant contributions to both intellectual threads in the field of operations research: one, optimization — combinatorial, linear, and nonlinear — and number two, stochastic processes.”

Indeed, Bertsimas’ work has helped develop both better tools for studying and conducting operations, while also having a wide range of applications. As Bertsimas noted in his lecture, the deaths of both of his parents in 2009 helped propel him to start looking at extensively at ways operations research could help health care.

Bertsimas received his BS in electrical engineering and computer science from the National Technical University of Athens in Greece. Moving to MIT for his graduate work, he then earned his MS in operations research and his PhD in applied mathematics and operations research. Bertsimas joined the MIT faculty after receiving his doctorate, and has remained at the Institute ever since.

Bertsimas is also known as an energetic teacher who has been the principal advisor to a remarkable number of PhD students — 106 and counting, at this point.

“It is far and away my favorite activity, to supervise my doctoral students,” Bertsimas said. “It is a privilege, in my opinion, to work with exceptional young people like the ones we have at MIT, in ability and character and aspiration. They actually make me a better scientist, and a better person.”

“MIT is part of my identity,” Bertsimas quipped while noting that he is the only faculty member on campus who has those three letters, in order, in his first name.

In the latter part of the lecture, Bertsimas highlighted work he has been doing as vice provost of open learning at MIT. He has personally developed an large online course based on his own material, “The Analytics Edge.” In his current role, Bertsimas said, he now aspires for MIT to reach a billion learners with online courses, part of his effort to “democratize access to education.”

Bertsimas also demonstrated for the audience some AI tools he and his colleagues are working to bring to online education, including ways of condensing material, and the translation of online material into other languages.

It is just one more chapter in a long and broad-ranging career dedicated to grasping phenomena and developing tools to help us navigate it.

Or as Berstimas noted while summarizing his scholarship at one point in the lecture, “I try to increase the human understanding of how the world works.” 

de MIT News https://ift.tt/492KYOo

Bridging medical realities in the study of technology and health

A few weeks ago, Amy Moran-Thomas and 20 students in her class 21A.311 (The Social Lives of Medical Objects) were gathered around a glucose meter, a jar of test strips, and various spare medical parts in the MIT Museum seminar room, talking about how to make them work better.

The class had just heard a presentation from the president of the Belize Diabetes Association in Dangriga, Norma Flores, a nurse whose hospital had recently received a huge shipment of insulin that, although durable in theory, seemed to have spoiled in a heat wave. Flores and the students discussed whether scientists could develop temperature-stable insulin and design repairable glucose meters and other technologies for hospitals worldwide.

“Whenever people keep saying they are concerned about an issue, but the medical literature doesn’t describe it yet, there is a key question about what’s happening,” says Moran-Thomas. “Ethnography can help us learn about it.”

For Moran-Thomas, an MIT anthropologist, that class session was a way of connecting people and ideas that are too often overlooked. Flores was a central figure in Moran-Thomas’ 2019 book, “Traveling with Sugar: Chronicles of a Global Epidemic,” about diabetes in Belize and the failures of medical technology designed to treat it. (At the end of class, Flores surprised Moran-Thomas with a framed commendation from the Belize Diabetes Association for their nearly 20 years of work together.)

That approach informs all of Moran-Thomas’ work. Currently she is co-leading a group working on a project called the “Sugar Atlas,” mapping the social and economic dimensions of diabetes in the Caribbean, in tandem with scholars Nicole Charles of the University of Toronto and Tonya Haynes of the University of West Indies. Moran-Thomas has also spent more than a decade following the case of notorious medical experiments that took place in Guatemala in the 1940s, the subject of a recent paper she published with Susan Reverby of Wellesley College.

Closer to home, Moran-Thomas is working on a book about how energy extraction affects chronic conditions and mental health in her native Pennsylvania, at a time of increasing hospital closures. As part of this research, she has been working with MIT seismologist William Frank to develop low-cost sensors that people can use to measure the impact of industrial activity on their home neighborhoods. The research team was recently awarded a grant by the MIT Human Insight Collaborative (MITHIC) for the work. And with another MITHIC grant, Moran-Thomas and several colleagues are working to create a new “Health and Society” educational program at MIT.

“A through line in my work is the question about how to put people at the center of health and medicine,” says Moran-Thomas, an associate professor in MIT’s anthropology program. “Because that’s not how it feels to most people in the world. Care technologies that work for everybody, and health technologies in relation to chronic disease, connect all these different projects.”

The work Moran-Thomas may be best known for occurred in 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic, when her research recovered an array of neglected clinical studies showing that oximeters functioned differently depending on the skin color of patients. After she published a piece about it in the Boston Review, further hospital studies by physicians who found the essay confirmed a pattern of disproportionately inaccurate readings, leading to subsequent efforts to improve the technology — all steming from her careful, patient-centric approach.

“What anthropology has to offer the world, and other knowledge systems, is the insights of people that might be missing from many accounts, and highlighting these stories that are getting left out,” Moran-Thomas says. “Those are not footnotes, but the central thing to follow. And those histories are also alive in the material world around us.”

Thinking across medical and climate technologies

After growing up in Pennsylvania, Moran-Thomas majored in literature while earning her BA from American University. She decided to pursue ethnographic research as a graduate student, and entered Princeton University’s program in anthropology, earning an MA in 2008 and her PhD in 2012. After postdoc stints at Princeton and Brown University, Moran-Thomas joined the MIT faculty in 2015.

At Princeton, Moran-Thomas’ dissertation research examined the diabetes epidemic in Belize, forming the basis of her first book, “Traveling with Sugar,” whose title is an expression in Belize for living with diabetes. As she chronicles in the book, plantation-era changes that undermined indigenous agriculture, among other things, contributed to a local economy that made diets sugar-heavy, while medical technologies are often unreliable or ill-suited to local conditions. The book also traces breakdowns in care technologies, such as prosthetic limbs (often sought after diabetes-linked amputations), glucose meters, hyperbaric chambers, insulin supply chains, dialysis machines, and pain management technologies.

“Traveling with Sugar” also develops a critique that has become a theme of Moran-Thomas’ work: that society often shifts the blame for illness onto patients while minimizing the larger-scale factors affecting everyday health.

“There can be this focus on exclusively prevention without care, the implicit assumption that patients need to act differently,” Moran-Thomas says. “Blame falls on individuals and families instead of a focus on other questions. Why are these technologies always breaking down? How are they designed, and by whom, for whom? What role is history playing in the present? And how are people trying to remake those structures?”

Those issues are highlighted in Moran-Thomas’ ongoing project, “Sugar Atlas: Counter-Mapping Diabetes from the Caribbean,” which is backed by a two-year Digital Justice Seed Grant from the American Council of Learned Societies. Whereas international organizations tend to lump North America and the Caribbean together when tracking diabetes, this project zooms in on specific aspects of the disease and its historical and structural contributors in the Caribbean, such as the distance people must travel to buy vegetables, their proximity to insulin supplies, and the ways climate change is affecting sea life and fishing practices.

“We’re trying to create a community platform offering a different vision of these conditions,” Moran-Thomas says of the effort to map otherwise unrecorded aspects of the global diabetes epidemic, while tracing mutual aid networks and people’s “arts of care” in the present.

Better design for common devices

Following her research in Belize, where glucose meters were prone to breaking, Moran-Thomas began taking a more active focus on the design of medical technology. At MIT, she began co-teaching a course with tech innovator Jose Gomez-Marquez, 21A.311 (The Social Lives of Medical Objects). The idea was to get students to think about device design that could lead to more durable, fixable, and equitable products.

In turn, Moran-Thomas’ interest in devices led her to question the pulse oximeter readings she started seeing first-hand during the Covid-19 pandemic. Pulse oximeters measure oxygen saturation levels in patients and are a part of even routine appointment check-ins. They work visually, casting beams of light to measure the color of hemoglobin, which varies depending on how much oxygen it contains. 

After firsthand encounters with the sensors led to more research, Moran-Thomas learned that some medical professionals had lingering, unanswered questions about pulse oximeters and they way they were calibrated. After she published her essay in the Boston Review, arguing for more data collection, medical researchers examined the issue more closely, finding that patients with darker skin were about three times more likely to have erroneous blood-oxygen readings than patients with lighter skin. Ultimately, an FDA panel recommended changes to the devices.

“A lot of my work has been learning about health and medicine technologies from the perspectives of patients, families, and nurses, rather than beginning with engineers and doctors,” Moran-Thomas says. “Those two projects, about blood sugar and blood oxygen, were about the shortcomings of those devices and how they could be improved. Those are perspectives I can highlight in hopes others will pick up on them and make other kinds of designs and policies possible.”

Moran-Thomas’ interest in device design has continued with her current book project, about the chronic health effects of energy production in Pennsylvania. She has worked with MIT seismologist William Frank, of the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, to construct an inexpensive meter people can use to measure shaking in their homes caused by industrial activities. (After colleagues in western Pennsylvania reached out with seismic concerns, Moran-Thomas first got the idea to contact Frank after reading about his work in MIT News, incidentally).

The effort is also inspired by guidance from community leaders based at the Center for Coalfield Justice in western Pennsylvania. The research team has received a MITHIC Connectivity grant for their project, “Seismic Collaboratory: Rural Health, Missing Science, and Communicating the Chronic Impacts of Extraction.”

“I’ve met people who have been told by their doctors they must have vertigo, while they thought the walls of their house were really shaking,” Moran-Thomas says. “In a case like that, the device you need is not in the clinic, it’s a monitor at home.”

The book, overall, will examine the effects of energy production on chronic disease and mental health issues in Pennsylvania, something exacerbated by more hospitals being shuttered in the state.

Moran-Thomas is simultaneously working with several co-investigators to create the “Health and Society” educational program at MIT, including Katharina Ribbeck, Erica James, Aleshia Carlsen-Bryan, and Dina Asfaha. Their work was recently awarded an Education Innovation Seed Grant from MITHIC.

From small devices to large-scale changes in health care systems, from the U.S. to other regions, Moran-Thomas remains focused on a core set of issues about how to improve and broaden health care — and lessen the need for it in the first place.

“Thinking across scales is something that’s really useful about anthropology,” Moran-Thomas says. “Even one medical device is a tiny piece of a bigger infrastructure. In order to study that technology or device or sensor, you have to understand the bigger infrastructure it’s attached to, and that there are people involved in all parts of it.” 

de MIT News https://ift.tt/5cqswja

Weekends@MIT offers connection through varied activities

Weekends at MIT are often a time for students to catch up on sleep or finish p-sets, lab work, and other school assignments. But for more than two decades, through a student-driven initiative supported by the Division of Student Life (DSL), students have been able to find welcoming activities designed to build community on Friday and Saturday nights through Weekends@MIT. All events are open to both graduate and undergraduate students.

At the heart of Weekends@MIT is a leadership team within the Wellbeing Ambassadors program. Ten leadership team members plan and host a variety of events from 9 to 11 p.m. in the MIT Wellbeing Lab, transforming the space into a hub for connection and creativity. While DSL staff provide advising, logistical support, and funding, event ideas come from students. Club members are committed to facilitating student social activities, all while increasing health awareness.

Student-led activities

Student ownership is intentional, says Robyn Priest, an assistant dean in the Division of Student Life. “All the ideas for activities come from the students. Leaders brainstorm themes, vote on their favorite concepts, and spearhead events in small teams. The only criterion is that it be substance-free. The students involved are dedicated, and the time commitment can be significant, so they are paid. But our students consistently step up, motivated by the opportunity to create experiences for their peers.”

Past events have included craft nights with boba tea, yoga, trivia competitions, bracelet-making workshops, waffle nights with customizable toppings, and even Spooky Skate, a Halloween costume ice-skating event hosted by the club in the Z Center.

Priest notes that just this past fall semester, more than 2,000 students attended the Friday night events, with many programs designed as drop-in experiences so students can participate around their busy schedules.

“I joined Weekends@MIT because I really liked the idea of helping organize activities on campus that promoted well-being for students and provided them with chill events that they can attend to build community and feel good on Friday nights,” says junior Emily Crespin Guerra.

Senior Ruting Hung adds, “I wanted to become more involved in promoting wellness on campus. Since then, I've found that it has also served as a way for me to recharge after a long week.”

Expanding Saturday events

Saturdays bring additional variety through collaborations with student clubs and groups. Organizations can apply for funding — typically several hundred dollars — to host events between 9 and 11 p.m. that are open to all students.

Undergraduate and graduate organizations, cultural groups, and hobby-based clubs have all contributed to programming. The partnerships also introduce new audiences to the Wellbeing Lab, helping the space become a familiar and welcoming destination across campus communities.

Connecting the campus through communication

Another key component of Weekends@MIT is a weekly newsletter distributed to thousands of students. The newsletter highlights upcoming programs in the Wellbeing Lab, along with other campus events that align with the initiative’s goals of connection and community without alcohol.

First-year student Vivian Dinh notes, “I love how the events provide a fun escape from the stress of classes and problem sets. The Wellbeing Lab is such a nice facility on campus for students to relax and enjoy themselves.”

A long tradition, evolving for the future

The current initiative builds on a long history of student-led weekend programming that began more than 20 years ago. Over time, the effort has evolved — from early safety campaigns to today’s comprehensive model focused on well-being, belonging, and social connection — but the core idea remains the same: students creating healthy spaces for other students.

Looking ahead, Weekends@MIT aims to continue expanding collaborations and exploring new ways to bring communities together on weekends. Additional events for this semester include: pupusas; blitz chess tournament with the Chess Club; craft night; movies and waffles; mocktails and latte art; a Bob Ross paint night, and much more.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/lFtCXUy