Looking beyond research

In Professor Anna-Christina Eilers’ research group, mentorship happens through small, meaningful gestures: thoughtful feedback on a draft, a check-in after a rough week, and a readiness to help when things get tough. For her students, these everyday moments have become a defining feature of her approach.

An observational astrophysicist, Eilers studies how the universe evolved from its earliest beginnings. Her research investigates the formation and growth of black holes across cosmic time, particularly during the “cosmic dawn,” when the first stars, galaxies, and quasars illuminated the young universe.

Working alongside her in this field, graduate students describe a mentor who pairs high expectations with genuine attentiveness, encouraging both scientific independence and a strong sense of community. This approach has earned Eilers recognition through MITs Committed to Caring initiative — a student-driven program honoring exemplary mentorship within the graduate community.

Showing up in the everyday moments

Students say one of Eilers’ defining qualities is her consistency. No matter how busy her schedule, they know they can count on thoughtful feedback, productive meetings, and regular conversations about both research and broader career development. While those practices may sound routine, her mentees emphasize that they are anything but guaranteed within many academic spaces.

“As Christina's advisees,” two students wrote in their joint nomination, “we are both extremely grateful for the professional and emotional support we constantly receive. She always keeps an eye out for us.”

Eilers’ support takes many forms. Students describe an advisor who carefully reads every draft, provides timely and detailed feedback, and creates space for conversations that extend beyond immediate research questions. 

Students also reflect on the manner in which Eilers celebrates their wins alongside them. “She brings our favorite desserts to group meetings when we publish a paper,” shared one nominator. 

Her attentiveness becomes especially meaningful when challenges arise. Students note that she regularly checks in on them and does not hesitate to step in when research collaborations become difficult or obstacles threaten to slow their progress. Rather than leaving them to navigate those situations alone, she helps identify solutions before small problems become larger ones.

For Eilers, building a successful research group means cultivating connections among its members as well as producing strong science.

One of the group’s traditions takes place whenever a member returns from a conference or research visit. The traveler brings back a small treat — cookies, chocolates, or another local specialty — to share during the next group meeting. Along with the snacks comes a conversation about the talks they attended, the researchers they met, and the ideas they brought home.

The tradition transforms an individual trip into a shared opportunity for learning, with new perspectives becoming part of the group’s collective conversation. These exchanges work to not only reinforce a sense of community, but also to expose students to research and ideas beyond their own projects.

Through moments like these, students develop both as researchers and as colleagues who celebrate one another’s successes and learn from one another's discoveries. 

Remembering the person behind the researcher

One of Eilers’ most consistent pieces of advice has little to do with coursework or research.

“I always recommend to incoming graduate students to find a hobby outside of work that they enjoy, and ideally where they interact with people they don’t work with,” she says.

She believes maintaining interests beyond the lab helps students sustain both their curiosity and their perspective. “Graduate school can be all-consuming,” she says, reflecting on her own experiences. “It's easy to let your research become your entire identity.”

This same philosophy shapes her mentorship: successful researchers are also people with lives, relationships, and interests beyond their work. Making space for those parts of life helps students build careers that are both ambitious and sustainable.

Eilers traces her approach to the advisors who shaped her own career.

“I was very fortunate to have had — and continue to have — several mentors who have challenged me scientifically and supported me along the way," she says. “They modeled how to pursue excellent research without losing sight of the importance of personal connection and integrity.”

Her students see these values reflected within the group environment. They are encouraged to tackle ambitious questions while developing the confidence to think independently, but they know that guidance is available when they need it. 

In their nominations of Eilers, students describe an advisor who is present in both the ordinary and the difficult moments — someone who notices when support is needed, advocates for her students, celebrates their successes, and builds a community where students consistently feel seen. 

Through this steady commitment, Eilers demonstrates that care is not separate from academic excellence. Rather, it creates the conditions that allow excellence to flourish.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/roVxDb9

MIT projects selected for funding under US Department of Energy’s Genesis Mission

MIT researchers are set to contribute to the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Genesis Mission, with 15 collaborative projects among those selected for funding under Genesis Phase I, DOE announced Wednesday.

The Genesis Mission, a national initiative, intends to build “the world’s most powerful integrated science discovery platform” by incentivizing cross-sector collaborations that leverage AI, supercomputing, quantum systems, and advanced scientific instruments to accelerate breakthroughs in energy, scientific discovery, and national security.

“MIT researchers are proud to be leading and contributing to projects under the Genesis Mission, in vital areas of research that support national priorities,” says Ian A. Waitz, MIT’s vice president for research. “The Genesis Mission represents a fantastic opportunity to catalyze the power of universities, industry, and the U.S. national laboratories to advance science, technology, and innovation for the benefit of the nation and the world.”

The DOE announced the initial projects during its Genesis Summit in Washington on Wednesday. The research funding to MIT is pending completion of negotiations toward an award agreement for each project. In phase I, funded project teams will work to demonstrate research workflows that integrate AI with scientific investigation, and to rigorously evaluate the scientific merit of their approach.

Projects under the Genesis Mission are collaborative by design; teams must draw on the expertise of researchers from academia, industry, and/or the national laboratories. Among the selected phase I projects with MIT involvement are those that aim to develop powerful quantum sensors to help explain fundamental questions about the universe; advance knowledge of chemical-free methods to extract rare earth elements; model the behavior of plasma in fusion tokamaks and future fusion reactors; develop digital twins for fusion magnet systems; exploit the self-assembly of biomolecules to design materials with targeted properties; generatively design rotating blades for machinery systems; and more. Phase I projects that identify promising pathways toward transformative capabilities at scale may be considered by DOE for further Genesis Mission funding.

Six of the selected projects are to be led by MIT principal investigators (PIs):

• AI-Driven Discovery of Electrochemical Separation Methods for Rare Earth Elements
  MIT lead: Martin Bazant (Department of Chemical Engineering, ChemE), Chevron Professor in Chemical Engineering and professor of mathematics
   
• AI for Learning Missing Constitutive Structure in Fracture Models
  MIT lead: Laurent Demanet (Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences), professor of applied mathematics and co-director of the MIT Center for Computational Science and Engineering
   
• AI-Driven Quantum Sensing for Precision Tests of Fundamental Physics
  MIT lead: Ronald Garcia Ruiz (Laboratory for Nuclear Science, LNS), associate professor of physics and Thomas A. Frank (1977) Career Development Professor
   
• Multi-Agent Inverse Design of Block Polypeptoids Into Hierarchical Nanostructures
  MIT lead: Bradley Olsen (ChemE), Alexander and I. Michael Kasser (1960) Professor
   
• CATALYST: Core Accelerated Trajectories with Augmented Learning bY Sim-to-experiment Transfer
  MIT lead: Cristina Rea (Plasma Science and Fusion Center), principal research scientist and division head for data science
   
• Multi-Modal and Multi-Facility Application of the FM4NPP Foundation Model: Silicon Trackers and Electron Colliders
  MIT lead: Gunther Roland (LNS), professor of physics and division head for experimental nuclear and particle physics

MIT researchers are expected to participate in another nine selected projects led by other institutions, companies, and labs:

• Framework for Optimized Rotating Blade Design Using Generative Engineering (FORGE)
  Project lead: GE Vernova Advanced Research Center
  MIT lead: Faez Ahmed (Department of Mechanical Engineering), associate professor of mechanical engineering and the Esther and Harold E. Edgerton Career Development Professor
   
• Superconducting Polychronous Computation Near Criticality
  Project lead: Argonne National Laboratory
  MIT lead: Karl Berggren (Research Laboratory of Electronics), the Julius A. Stratton Professor in Electrical Engineering and Physics
   
• Scalable Agentic Digital Twins for Autonomous Precision Facilities
  Project lead: Texas A&M University
  MIT lead: Ronald Garcia Ruiz (LNS)
   
• Agentic AI for Real-Time Expedited Discovery from High-Complexity EIC Data Streams
  Project lead: Purdue University
  MIT lead: Philip Harris (LNS), associate professor of physics
   
• Self-Driving Discovery and Co-Design of MXene Memristors for 3D Compute-in-Memory Systems
  Project lead: Northeastern University
  MIT lead: Ju Li (Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, NSE), the Carl Richard Soderberg Professor in Power Engineering and professor of materials science and engineering
   
• A-WILD: AI-driven Workflows for Intelligent Lab Discovery
  Project lead: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)
  MIT lead: Ju Li (NSE)
   
• A Foundational Generative AI Framework to Advance Water-Energy Security
  Project lead: LBNL
  MIT lead: Haruko Wainwright (NSE), Atlantic Richfield Career Development Professor in Energy Studies, assistant professor of nuclear science and engineering, and assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering
   
• An AI-Driven Platform for HLW Repository Design and Analysis with Digital Twins, GIS Data Integration, and Surrogate Models
  Project lead: LBNL
  MIT lead: Haruko Wainwright (NSE)
   
• Toward Physics-Informed Digital Twins for Fusion Magnet Systems
  Project lead: LBNL
  MIT lead: Holger Witte (LNS), associate director of MIT’s Bates Research and Engineering Center.

“The extraordinary response to this Genesis Mission application process demonstrates that America’s scientific community is ready to reimagine how discovery happens,” said DOE Under Secretary Darío Gil SM ’00 PhD ’03, in the DOE’s announcement. “Through the Genesis Mission, we are bringing together the nation’s leading researchers, institutions, and technology partners to build the next generation of scientific capability. We look forward to seeing these teams demonstrate new research workflows that accelerate discovery and reveal what is possible when AI and science advance together.”

A complete list of the first Genesis Mission projects selected for award negotiations is available from the U.S. Department of Energy.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/b0WAQN8

Professor Emeritus Dimitri Bertsekas, influential computer scientist and prolific author, dies at 83

Dimitri Bertsekas PhD ’71, the Jerry McAfee (1940) Emeritus Professor in Engineering in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), a principal investigator in the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS), and the Fulton Professor of Computational Decision Making at Arizona State University, died on June 3 at his home in Belmont, Massachusetts. He was 83 years old. 

Over the course of his career, Bertsekas’ research spanned, and had a definitive influence upon, several fields, including optimization, control, large-scale computation, reinforcement learning, and artificial intelligence. He served as a consultant to various private companies; an editor for several scientific journals; the founder of a publishing company, Athena Scientific; and chief scientific advisor of Bayforest Technologies, a London-based quantitative investment company. However, his most lasting impact may have come through his prolific authorship and co-authorship of over 20 highly influential books, monographs, and textbooks, and through his vast network of students, mentees, friends, and collaborators.

Bertsekas earned his undergraduate degree at the National Technical University of Athens, Greece, before obtaining his MS in electrical engineering at George Washington University in 1969, and his PhD in system science at MIT in 1971. He began his faculty career at Stanford University, where he spent three years, and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where he spent five more before returning to MIT in 1979. He would stay with MIT’s Department of EECS until 2019, at which point he became a full-time faculty member at Arizona State University at Tempe. Along the way, Bertsekas taught, advised, and mentored students who would eventually become his colleagues at all four institutions. 

“Dimitri played a defining role in my career,” says Asu Ozdaglar, department head of EECS at MIT. “I decided to change my research focus after taking his nonlinear optimization class. The conceptual clarity and the mathematical rigor he has brought to every topic, combined with his ability to connect theory to important problems established a foundation that has continued to inform my scholarly work in the years to follow.” Another former MIT student, Jinane Abounadi, now executive director of the MIT Sandbox Innovation Fund Program, still remembers Bertsekas’ tutelage as a highlight of her time as a student at MIT: “I feel so fortunate to have had Dimitri as my professor and advisor. I had the opportunity to learn about optimization, dynamic programming, and neuro-dynamic programming from a true master.” 

A former student at the University of Illinois, Steven E. Shreve remembers being impressed by Bertsekas’ course on nonlinear optimization and asking if Bertsekas would consider becoming his PhD advisor. “Rather than answering my question directly, Dimitri gave me a preliminary draft of his manuscript, which eventually became his book 'Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Control,' and asked me to proofread it,” remembers Shreve, now Orion Hoch University Professor Emeritus in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie Mellon University. “From this manuscript, I learned the theory of dynamic programming and mastered many important special cases. Talking with Dimitri as I read, I received one-on-one instruction. When the book finally appeared, Dimitri generously acknowledged my participation, as if I had done him a favor, rather than the other way around.” The gambit was typical of Bertsekas’ understated approach to mentorship; after the first successful collaboration, Bertsekas arranged a research fellowship for Shreve and challenged him to solve a fundamental question in dynamic programming. “I needed to learn a good deal of set theory to even think about the question he asked,” remembers Shreve, whose work on the problem was combined with Bertsekas’ notes to create their co-authored book “Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete Time Case.” 

“Working with Dimitri on [that book] is how I learned to write,” says Shreve. “I learned from Dimitri that if you want to be recognized for your research, you must present it so others want to read it, and I learned how to do that.” 

The clarity and elegance of Bertsekas’ explanatory style would become his educational hallmark. “Everyone recognized Dimitri’s great talents as a writer, but he went far beyond that, organizing entire subjects into something that was understandable and a well-organized totality,” says Robert Gallager, professor emeritus of electrical engineering at MIT, who co-authored a 1987 book with Bertsekas entitled “Data Networks.” “The field was changing rapidly then, with a factor-of-two decrease every two years in computation costs, and with optical fiber on the horizon for transmission. Dimitri and I each understood only parts of this field, with the rest a fast-moving learning experience. Dimitri was the ideal partner in this, able to quickly translate hard concepts into simple but accurate explanations and able to combine my knowledge with his into an understandable whole.” 

Bertsekas’ close colleague in LIDS, Munther Dahleh, remembers, “what always struck me was that, through his writing, one could almost hear Dimitri speaking directly to the reader. His intuition, clarity of thought, and distinctive perspective come through beautifully in his books. They reflect not only his profound technical contributions, but also his passion for teaching and his desire to help others understand the subject at a deep level. … In particular, his joint book with John Tsitsiklis on neuro-dynamic programming is a tour de force. It anticipated and helped define many of the ideas that later became central to reinforcement learning and approximate dynamic programming.” 

Tsitsiklis himself remembers the co-writing process with Bertsekas fondly: “For Dimitri, research was a creative form, combining craftsmanship and the creativity that we usually call art.” The definition of art and its practice was a subject of great fascination for Bertsekas, and one that he explored at length in his 2025 essay, “Academia, Art, and Life,” an attempt to meaningfully categorize creative work into three broadly descriptive roles — technician, craftsman, and artist — and to explore the overlaps between the three types of practice. Beyond his clear and lucid writing, Bertsekas was known for his strong graphic eye, a talent which he put to good use not only developing illustrations for all his textbooks, but in taking memorable and artistically inspired photographs of his worldwide travels. 

Longtime collaborator and friend David Castañón, now a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Boston University, remembers Bertsekas as a true Renaissance man who drew inspiration from countless sources: “Dimitri had an insatiable curiosity for algorithmic ideas, both theory and practice. Many of these ideas were inspired by new technologies (parallel computers, reinforcement learning, chess-playing algorithms) ... Whenever we met, Dimitri would introduce new concepts of interest; we would work out theoretical details, design and conduct numerical experiments, and generate results. Then, Dimitri’s artistic talents would take over: designing graphics to illustrate concepts, typesetting text and figures for the papers to be completed. He had a rare gift for generating concise explanations of complex concepts. These talents led to his publishing company Athena Scientific, where Dimitri and his coauthors generated elegant pedagogical volumes with broad appeal.” Tsitsiklis agrees, noting, “for Dimitri, [research] was about discovering meaning, to uncover the 'right' way to view a subject, enrich it, and convey it in a crystal-clear manner through his prolific writings.” 

Many of the 20-plus books either authored or co-authored by Bertsekas were adopted for use as textbooks at MIT in subjects including data networks, nonlinear programming, dynamic programming, network optimization, parallel and distributed computation, neuro-dynamic programming, convex analysis and optimization, probability, and reinforcement learning. Stephen Boyd, Samsung Professor in the School of Engineering at Stanford, testifies to the great impact of Bertsekas’ collected works: “generations of researchers in optimization, control, and many related areas learned these topics from Dimitri’s exquisitely clear and beautifully written text books. I was one of them; indeed, I went into these fields in no small part because of Dimitri’s books, and his influence has been with me the whole time.”

That influence can be measured by the sheer number of awards and honors Bertsekas accumulated over the course of his career, including the INFORMS 1997 Prize for Research Excellence in the Interface Between Operations Research and Computer Science for Neuro-Dynamic Programming, the 2001 ACC John R. Ragazzini Education Award, the 2009 INFORMS Expository Writing Award, the 2014 ACC Richard E. Bellman Control Heritage Award for “contributions to the foundations of deterministic and stochastic optimization-based methods in systems and control,” the 2014 Khachiyan Prize for Life-Time Accomplishments in Optimization, the SIAM/MOS 2015 George B. Dantzig Prize, and the 2022 IEEE Control Systems Award. Together with his coauthor John Tsitsiklis, he was awarded the 2018 INFORMS John von Neumann Theory Prize for the contributions of the research monographs “Parallel and Distributed Computation” and “Neuro-Dynamic Programming.” In 2001, Bertsekas was elected to the U.S. National Academy of Engineering for “pioneering contributions to fundamental research, practice and education of optimization/control theory.”

However, a more personal measure of Bertsekas’ impact can be taken by the warmth and affection with which his friends, co-workers, and former students uniformly remember him. Co-author John Tsitsiklis wrote, “I was most fortunate to be one of his apprentices, and to have lived his warmth and friendship.” His former student at MIT, Angelia Nedich, later became Bertsekas’ colleague at Arizona State University. She remembers: “Dimitri was an exceptional mind, a gifted soul that shed light for us seekers, but at the same time he was very humble as he enjoyed simple moments of life, a sip of good coffee, a bite of flavorful food, or a glass of spicy margarita on our road trips in Southwest. That is how I love to remember him.”

Former student Benjamin Van Roy, now a professor at Stanford, wrote about the transformation of Bertsekas from authority figure to friend (and the subject of friendly teasing). “I recall the intimidating comments of more senior PhD students as I began my own PhD journey in LIDS. Some referred to Dimitri as an “immortal.” Another comment I recall fondly — and often reminded Dimitri about — was: “Professor Bertsekas is a very handsome man!” Their bond continued long after Van Roy’s graduation. “Dimitri was a treasure to humanity: one of the great scholars of our time, a Renaissance man, and a phenomenal role model. I was privileged to be among the many he mentored, and even more privileged to count him as a longtime friend.” Yuchao Li, a postdoc mentored by Bertsekas at Arizona State University, remembers his mentor as an almost inexhaustible source of both inspiration and support: “For me, Professor Bertsekas was like a loving father, full of infinite wisdom. … He seemed to know everything, yet he remained deeply humble and open-minded. He was always eager to help, even at the slightest sign of difficulty in my life. He instilled in me a lasting faith in the very best qualities of human beings, and I will strive to carry that faith forward.”

Bertsekas was preceded in death by his son Costas. He is survived by his wife Joanna Bertsekas (née Palashas); his son Telis Bertsekas and his wife Wendy Bertsekas; and three grandchildren, Melina, Alexandros, and Leonidas. 

de MIT News https://ift.tt/kilXcS2

Diffuse puffs of “missing” matter surround most galaxies

Stars and galaxies make up much of the universe’s ordinary, observable matter. But for decades, scientists have wrestled with a cosmic conflict: There should be much more. 

Physicists have good estimates of how much matter was present in the early universe. Shortly after the Big Bang, roughly 83 percent of all matter in the universe was composed of invisible dark matter, with ordinary matter making up the rest. And yet, these estimates exceed the amount of ordinary matter seen in stars and galaxies today. Where, then, did all the missing ordinary matter go? 

Now MIT scientists, as part of the CHIME/FRB Collaboration, are using far-off radio signals to reveal missing matter in the vast space between galaxies. The team has developed a new method to search out missing matter by combining locations of galaxies with detections of fast radio bursts. 

A fast radio burst, or FRB, is an ultrabright, millisecond flash of radio waves emitted by extremely energetic phenomena in the distant universe. As it travels through space, the signal from a fast radio burst gets stretched, or “smeared,” in time. The more missing matter that it passes through, the more smeared the signal becomes. 

The MIT-led team measured the degree of smearing experienced by thousands of FRB signals detected on Earth. Then they compared each FRB smear with locations of galaxies across the universe to determine how much of an FRB’s smearing was due to galaxy matter versus other, missing matter. 

The new method revealed not only whether missing matter was present, but also where. Specifically, the researchers discovered that it exists in very diffuse clouds surrounding groups of galaxies. These clouds extend out from the galaxies, to much further distances than scientists had predicted. 

“We find that, overall, where there are more galaxies, there tends to be more missing matter around them,” says Haochen Wang, a graduate student in MIT’s Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research.

The results, reported today in the journal Physical Review Letters, support the idea that matter is flung outside a galaxy through black hole jets, exploding stars, and other highly energetic processes within a galaxy. What’s more, the findings suggest that such processes are more energetic than scientists had thought. 

“We’re finding missing matter that is pushed out to larger scales,” says Kiyoshi Masui, associate professor of physics at MIT. “These measurements indicate that star activity, and activity from black holes, is stronger and much more violent than predicted.”

Masui and Wang are co-authors of the new study, which includes Shion Andrew, Adam Lanman, Kenzie Nimmo, and Ryan Raikman from MIT, and collaborators from multiple other institutions as part of the CHIME/FRB Collaboration. 

The shape of matter

The vast majority of ordinary, observable matter in the universe is built from baryons — a type of subatomic particle that includes protons and neutrons, and that makes up most of an atom’s mass. Scientists estimate that just 17 percent of the early universe was made from this “baryonic” matter, shortly after the Big Bang. 

Some of that early matter was forged into every substantial thing we see today, from planets, stars, and galaxies, to our own bodies. But as scientists have realized, this matter doesn’t quite add up. The total mass of all the stars, galaxies, and galactic clouds is about a tenth of the baryonic matter that existed in the early universe. There must be more matter, likely in the spaces between galaxies. But the universe is vast. Any leftover matter likely exists at extremely low densities, of around a single proton per cubic meter, making it extremely challenging to detect.  

Recently, however, Masui and others have found that such missing matter could be sussed out using fast radio bursts. FRBs were first discovered in 2007, and since then astronomers have detected several thousand of the mysterious, ultrashort signals from distant galaxies, billions of light years away. 

“What makes FRBs good to probe missing matter is that they have a special property,” Wang says. “They start out as a very quick flash, and as they pass through matter, they smear out in time. And we can measure that smearing very precisely, which is directly proportional to how much missing matter the FRB passed through.”

Researchers have previously taken advantage of this smearing property of FRBs to detect missing matter around galaxies. These efforts have confirmed that tenous clouds exist in the vast spaces between galaxies. Masui and Wang wanted to go a step further. 

“We’re not just probing if the gas is with the galaxy or not, but we are seeing the shape of the missing matter that’s around the galaxies,” Wang says. “By mapping the shape of missing matter, we can understand how galaxies form and how they interact with their environment.”

Galactic fountains

For their new study, the team mapped the shape of missing matter around galaxies by cross-correlating thousands of FRB measurements with locations of millions of galaxies. They used data from two sources: the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey. 

CHIME is a large radio telescope located in British Columbia, Canada, that is designed to scan the entire northern sky for incoming radio waves. The telescope is sensitive to ultrashort, ultrabright radio signals, and since it began observing, CHIME has detected about 4,000 fast radio bursts across the sky. 

DESI is an instrument that is mounted on the Mayall Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory, near Tucson, Arizona. The instrument makes detailed measurements of the light coming from over 30 million galaxies, to provide estimates of dark energy — the mysterious force that drives the expansion of the universe. 

From CHIME’s catalog of detections, members of the CHIME/FRB collaboration analyzed 2,870 FRB signals. Each signal is a burst of radio waves, at multiple wavelengths, from highest to lowest energy. The higher-energy “blue” waves typically are less affected by any missing matter they travel through, and therefore should arrive at a detector before lower-energy “red” wavelengths, which are more delayed, or “smeared,” in time. 

The team measured the smearing of each FRB’s various wavelengths, which they could then directly relate to the amount of matter that the FRB must have traveled through before reaching CHIME’s detectors. Masui and Wang then correlated these measurements with the locations of over 6 million galaxies provided by DESI data. In this way, they could look for an association between the missing matter and the galaxies, and measure where one is in relation to the other. 

Their analysis revealed a pattern: Missing baryonic matter tended to be found around galaxies and galaxy clusters. But rather than gathering close to galaxies in a dense ball, missing matter was scattered across a large radius, similar to a diffuse puff. 

“A galaxy is maybe a few 100,000 light years across, and we found missing matter out to about 4 million light years,” Masui says. “That’s further than the simulations predict, by quite a bit.”

“We are finding that the activity in galaxies is messier than we thought,” Wang says. “They’re more like fountains, and really push out gas to very large distances.”

The new results show that fast radio bursts can be a reliable method by which to search for missing matter. As CHIME continues to detect more FRBs, the team says its method can only improve.

“We got it to work for the first time, and will get it to work even more precisely as data gets better,” Masui says. 

CHIME and CHIME/FRB are supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and, the provinces of British Columbia, Québec, and Ontario. This study was supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/PcQgtAq

Engineering Design Studio hosts alumni on their fifth, 10th … and 55th reunions

Every year, MIT’s graduation coincides with the joyful reunion of classes past, but this year brought a special occasion for the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS). Senior Lecturer Gim Hom hosted a special reunion for around 15 of his classmates from the Class of 1971 in the Cypress Engineering Design Studio, a staffed makerspace and classroom run by the department. (Yes, for those of you doing some hasty subtraction, that is a 55th-year reunion.) Participants worked with electronic components just as they did in labs long ago, building their choice of two projects: a simplified electrocardiogram (ECG) and an audio amplifier. But the event wasn’t only a reunion. For Hom, the activity doubled as his chance to teach a “last class.” 

He explains: “As a lecturer, I use real-world problems and solutions to teach concepts in analog and digital design. For the reunion activity, I drew upon two existing labs from my courses and stripped out the theory material, leaving only the assembly for the reunion activity.”

For the first activity, attendees refreshed their soldering skills, assembling a printed circuit board (PCB) that approximated the design of an ECG before attaching electrodes and rolling up their sleeves (literally) to view the electrical impulses of their heartbeats. Hom explains that “in 6.2040 (Analog Lab), I use the ECG as a platform for teaching signal acquisition, filtering, and display. Students first analyze the design of an ECG circuit and then build and solder the board themselves, gaining hands-on experience with printed circuit board assembly. For many students, this is their first exposure to soldering.”

In the second activity, the alumni learned to surface mount solder, a skill that, while technically possible, had not yet become popularized during their time as undergraduates at MIT. “Modern electronics primarily rely on surface-mount technology (SMT),” explains Hom. “To give students exposure to SMT assembly, I designed an optional laboratory project: a small USB-powered audio amplifier that students can use to play music from their phones. While external speakers must be connected, the amplifier yields surprisingly good sound quality.”

Throughout the day, technical instructors Anthony Pennes and Liam Ackerman (both coincidentally celebrating their own reunions, at 10 and 5 years out from MIT, respectively) remained on hand to answer questions and familiarize attendees with the technology available in the Engineering Design Studio, which is open to the EECS community from morning until nearly midnight throughout the school year. 

“It was wonderful to see alumni leave with a working board with big smiles on their faces,” says Hom, who, while no longer teaching, will continue part time as an advisor to EECS students.

Meanwhile, his classmates have a working memento of their time at MIT — and a reminder that technical skills can last a lifetime. 

de MIT News https://ift.tt/5sgk6cK

Emery Brown, Daniel Hastings, and Douglas Lauffenburger named Institute Professors

A physician and neuroscientist who studies how anesthesia affects the brain; a leader in aerospace engineering, policy, and education; and the founding head of MIT’s Department of Biological Engineering have been awarded MIT’s highest faculty honor: the title of Institute Professor.

With the appointments of Emery Brown, Daniel Hastings SM ’78, PhD ’80, and Douglas Lauffenburger, there are now 12 Institute Professors at MIT, along with 10 Institute Professors Emeriti.

The appointments, which took effect July 1, were announced today in an email to the faculty from Sally Kornbluth, MIT’s president; Anantha Chandrakasan, MIT provost; and Roger Levy, chair of the faculty and a professor of brain and cognitive sciences. 

Emery Brown

Brown, who has been a member of the MIT faculty since 2005, says he is “tremendously honored” to be appointed as an Institute Professor.

“It’s a pleasure to know that your colleagues hold you in such high esteem and that the work that you’re doing is valued,” says Brown, the Edward Hood Taplin Professor of Medical Engineering. “When you look down the list of people who have had this title, it’s an amazing group.”

After graduating from Harvard University with a bachelor’s degree in applied mathematics in 1978, Brown earned a PhD in statistics, also from Harvard, and an MD from Harvard Medical School. Since 1992, he has been a member of the Harvard Medical School faculty, and until recently he was a practicing anesthesiologist at Massachusetts General Hospital. 

Throughout his career, Brown has made contributions in several different areas of neuroscience. In the early stages of his research career, he developed statistical methods to characterize the properties of the human circadian clock. He showed how light exposure can shift the phase of the human clock, depending on the circadian phase during which the light is administered. He also developed methods to demonstrate, from analyses of physiological data collected under special low-light conditions, that the intrinsic period of the human clock, like that of other species, is closer to 24 hours and not 25. Brown also measured the impact of shift work schedules that were designed using circadian physiology. 

Later, he developed new statistical techniques and signal processing methods to analyze data collected in systems neuroscience experiments. As part of this work, he devised algorithms to decode the position of an animal in its environment by reading the activity of a small group of place cell neurons in the animal’s brain. 

Joining MIT’s faculty just over 20 years ago represented an “inflection point” in his career, Brown says. 

“I was an anesthesiologist doing statistical research, interested in neuroscience, and MIT allowed me to tie all those together,” he says. “I could work with colleagues who could help me understand the neuroscience of anesthesia, have another outlet for the statistical research that I was doing, and also more direct interactions with undergraduates and grad students.”

Over the past two decades, Brown has applied statistical techniques to studying what happens to the brain under anesthesia. His work has revealed how drugs such as propofol alter the brain’s intrinsic oscillations, which can be seen with electroencephalography (EEG).

During the awake state, these oscillations usually have high frequencies and low amplitudes, but as anesthetic drugs are given, they shift to low frequencies and high amplitudes. These changes disrupt normal communication between different brain regions, leading to loss of consciousness.

Brown has also shown that these EEG oscillations can be used to monitor whether a patient is too deeply unconscious, and he has developed a closed-loop anesthesia delivery system that can monitor these oscillations in real-time and guide anesthetic dosing during surgery. 

In 2024, Brown was presented with the National Medal of Science. Among his other awards, he is also a recipient of a National Institute of Health Director’s Pioneer Award, the Gruber Prize in Neuroscience, and the Swartz Prize for Computational and Theoretical Neuroscience. He one of a small group of researchers to be an elected member of all three National Academies of Medicine, Sciences, and Engineering, as well as the National Academy of Inventors.

From 2012 to 2022, he served as co-director of the Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology. He has also played an instrumental role in several important efforts at MIT, including the 2010 Report on the Initiative for Faculty Race and Diversity, and the founding of the MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS) in 2015.

Outside of his work at MIT, Brown served on President Obama’s Brain Initiative Working Group, as well as the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Women in Science and Engineering and the Council of the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

Brown is also known for his commitment to teaching and mentoring students. In 2024, he was named a recipient of MIT’s “Committed to Caring” award — an honor given by MIT’s Office of Graduate Education to faculty members who have served as exceptional mentors to graduate students.

Daniel Hastings

When Hastings, the Cecil (1923) and Ida Green Professor in Education, was notified of the new distinction, it came as a total surprise.

“The people who were there will tell you that I could not believe it at first,” he says. “I never thought of myself as being in the same league as some of the Institute Professors I knew.”

Hastings grew up in England and Jamaica, and developed an early fascination with space, as a fan of the fictional “Star Trek,” and later “Star Wars” and “Stargate” (he’s seen every episode and movie of all three franchises), as well as the very real NASA Apollo program. 

After receiving a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Oxford University, he enrolled at MIT, earning his master’s degree in 1978 and PhD in 1980, both in aeronautics and astronautics. In 1985 he joined the faculty as an assistant professor and was promoted to full professor in 1993. 

Throughout his tenure, Hastings has made significant and lasting impacts in astronautical engineering, particularly through his studies in space plasma environment interactions, electric propulsion, and space systems architecture. 

His early research on the physical interactions between plasma and spacecraft, for which he co-wrote the definitive text (“Spacecraft Environment Interactions,” published in 1996), enabled the safe operation of solar panels on spacecraft today. Prior to Hastings’ work, high voltage solar arrays on satellites often experienced catastrophic arcing — a dangerous jumping of electrical current from one panel to another. These failures turned out to be a result of interactions with the surrounding space plasma. 

Hastings developed theories to characterize these interactions. His theories informed NASA’s design of the solar panels to power the International Space Station, which are still in operation today. His work also established guidelines across the aerospace industry on the design of resilient solar panels and ways to handle issues once in orbit. 

In his studies of electric propulsion, Hastings characterized the fundamental physical interactions between ion engine plumes and spacecraft systems. His work was pivotal in incorporating ion propulsion systems into many commercial satellites and deep space probes and helped to push what was an experimental technology into mainstream use in space propulsion.

In his more recent work, Hastings has explored the concept of flexible and distributed space architectures. He and his students are developing models for spacecraft that can serve purposes beyond their original mission intent. For instance, a spacecraft may incorporate a port that could serve as a waystation for future satellites to dock and refuel. Such a flexible and distributed system could help to support future missions to the moon and Mars.

In recognition of his research contributions, Hastings received the AIAA Losey Atmospheric Sciences Award in 2002, was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 2017, and was recognized as an honorary fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) in 2021. 

Throughout his career, Hastings has taken on numerous leadership roles, at the national, international, and Institute levels. Shortly after becoming full professor, he served as associate department head of research in MIT’s Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AeroAstro). He then took a two-year leave from the Institute to serve as chief scientist of the U.S. Air Force. During that time, he advised the Air Force chief of staff and secretary and successfully strengthened investments in space research in the U.S.  Air Force space program. 

Hastings has served as an advisor on multiple expert panels and boards, including as the chair of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, and as a member of the NASA Advisory Council, the National Science Board, the Intelligence Science Board, and most recently, the Defense Science Board and User Advisory Group of the National Space Council. He has also chaired multiple National Research Council studies and advised the space and engineering industries in various capacities, including serving on the boards of the Aerospace Corporation, Draper, and Blue Origin. He has just finished a two-year term as president of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

At MIT, Hastings has stepped up to serve in pivotal leadership posts. From 2000 to 2005, he served as the director of MIT’s Technology and Policy Program, then director of the Engineering Systems Division. From 2006 to 2013, as dean for undergraduate education, he helped to develop initiatives in equity, financial aid, and curriculum development, and strengthened international education and study abroad programs during a nationally challenging economic period. He received the Gordon Y. Billard Award in 2013 for his work on international education. In 2014 he began a five-year term as director of the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, during which he worked to reinforce MIT’s global collaborations. And from 2019 to 2023 he served as head of AeroAstro, supporting new research and educational initiatives as he navigated the department through the global pandemic.

Hastings has also worked in multiple capacities to make the Institute a more welcoming and inclusive community. He has served as associate dean of engineering for diversity, equity, and inclusion (2021-2023), Institute Community and Equity Officer (interim, 2023-2024), and co-chair of the MIT Values Statement Committee, as well as vice chancellor for undergraduate and graduate education (interim, 2024-2025). 

“MIT has been a great place for me,” Hastings reflects. “It has a mission to address some of the most pressing problems in the world. It is a high-energy place. This is a place that I am excited to work in and I want to give back to make it better.”

Douglas Lauffenburger

Lauffenburger, who is the Ford Professor of Biological Engineering, Chemical Engineering, and Biology, was the central founder of MIT’s Department of Biological Engineering, which he chaired from its inception in 1998 until 2019.

Before coming to MIT, Lauffenburger earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1975 and a PhD from the University of Minnesota at the Twin Cities in 1979, both in chemical engineering. 

While in graduate school, he became fascinated by the biological sciences. Early in his career, as a faculty member at the University of Pennsylvania and at the University of Illinois, his research and teaching straddled the line between chemical engineering and cell biology. Due to his unique background, MIT recruited Lauffenburger in the late 1990s to launch its new Department of Biological Engineering.

At the time, many universities had programs in biomedical engineering — an interdisciplinary field that applies techniques from electrical, chemical, or mechanical engineering to medical problems. Lauffenburger envisioned a distinct discipline of biological engineering, in which engineers would pursue an understanding of how biological systems function at the level of molecular and cellular mechanisms, with the goal of manipulating them to create new technologies for applications across medicine, energy, the environment, nutrition, and manufacturing.

“What was clear to me was that because biological systems comprise molecular processes, which are integrated in very complex ways, a true engineering analysis and design approach ought to be useful in moving it beyond mere tinkering and trial-and-error,” he says. “We needed to develop engineering frameworks for biology based on design principles, models, and predictions.”

As department head, Lauffenburger guided the development of new curricula at both graduate and undergraduate levels, and recruited faculty members whose work spanned engineering, molecular and cellular biology, microbiology, and immunology. The new department began offering graduate degrees in the late 1990s, and an undergraduate major beginning in 2005. Since its inception, the program has served as a model for similar programs at many other institutions worldwide.

Lauffenburger described being named an Institute Professor as “an honor that is especially gratifying because it recognizes the extraordinary impact of our unique MIT biological engineering department. I’ve been blessed with the rare opportunity to help create something revolutionary, here in this remarkable institution.”

Lauffenburger also played key roles in launching new interdisciplinary programs within MIT and with other institutions, including the Center for Biomedical Engineering, the Computational and Systems Biology Initiative, the DuPont-MIT Alliance, and the Cambridge-MIT Initiative.

His research has touched on many areas of biological science, including molecular cell biology, systems biology, and computational biology. Much of his work focuses on unraveling cell signaling mechanisms, using a combination of computational modeling and quantitative experiments. This work has shed light on processes such as cell proliferation, death, adhesion, and migration.

In the field of systems biology, he has created computational models across a spectrum of mathematical approaches, which can be used to identify drug targets and patient stratification strategies for a variety of diseases, including cancer and chronic inflammation, and predict the efficacy of drugs against those targets. 

In 2021, he and Linda Griffith, the School of Engineering Professor of Teaching Innovation at MIT, were jointly awarded the Bernard M. Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education, the most prestigious engineering education award in the United States.

Lauffenburger is an elected member of the National Academy of Engineering and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He is a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, a founding fellow of the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering, and has served as president of the Biomedical Engineering Society.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/mBz9ICk

School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences welcomes six new faculty for 2026

The MIT School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences (SHASS) and Dean Agustín Rayo recently welcomed six new professors to the MIT community. They arrive with diverse backgrounds and vast knowledge in their areas of research.

Grisha Coleman is a full professor in the Music and Theater Arts Section. Her research explores tensions between our physiological, technological, and ecological systems; human movement, our machines, and the places we inhabit. Her practice engages an interdisciplinary approach to these explorations. Coleman received the Doris Duke Foundation’s Performing Arts Technologies Lab Award. Her work has been supported by Carnegie Mellon University’s STUDIO for Creative Inquiry, Creative Capital, the Jerome Foundation, MacDowell, the MAP Fund, the National Endowment for the Arts, the New York Foundation for the Arts, Pioneer Works, the Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Center, Stanford University’s Mohr Visiting Artist program, and the Surdna Foundation. Coleman was previously a professor at Northeastern University and an associate professor at Arizona State University. She earned an MFA in music composition and integrated media from California Institute of the Arts.

Tung-Hui Hu is an associate professor with tenure in the Comparative Media Studies/Writing program. A poet and a scholar of digital media, he is the author of five books, most recently “Digital Lethargy: Dispatches from an Age of Disconnection” (MIT Press, 2022), “A Prehistory of the Cloud” (MIT Press, 2015), and “Greenhouses, Lighthouses” (Copper Canyon Press, 2013). Hu is interested in how concepts such as race and normal language became measurable, governable objects in the form of datasets. His research on data centers, artificial intelligence, burnout, and visual art has been featured in places such as CBS News, BBC Radio 4, WIRED, and MoMA R&D. He has been awarded fellowships from the American Academy in Rome, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the American Academy in Berlin. Prior to joining MIT, he was a faculty member at the University of Michigan.

Claire Luchette is an assistant professor in the Comparative Media Studies/Writing program. Luchette is the author of the novel “Agatha of Little Neon.” The winner of a Whiting Award and a National Book Foundation 5 Under 35 Honoree, Luchette has received fellowships from the Harvard Radcliffe Institute, the New York Public Library's Cullman Center for Scholars and Writers, MacDowell, Yaddo, and the National Endowment for the Arts. Their writing appears in Best American Short Stories, Ploughshares, and the Pushcart Prize anthology. Their second novel, “Swans,” and a story collection, “Big Whoop,” are forthcoming.

Shota Momma is an associate professor in the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. Momma is a specialist in psycholinguistics and its interaction with linguistic theory — with a particular focus on the mechanisms of sentence production. Previously, Momma taught as an assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. He earned a PhD in linguistics from the University of Maryland and completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of California San Diego. 

Lindsey Raymond PhD ’24 is an assistant professor in the Department of Economics, holding an MIT Schwarzman College of Computing shared position with the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Her research examines how new technologies shape labor markets and market competition, and how insights from economics can inform algorithm design. She is a Schmidt Sciences AI2050 Early Career Fellow and served as a staff economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisers in 2021–22. Before joining MIT, Raymond was a postdoc at Microsoft Research. She earned her PhD from MIT and her BA from Yale University.

Makoto Harris Takao is the Class of 1957 Career Development Professor in the Music and Theater Arts Section. Working at the intersection of cultural history, religious studies, and musicology, Takao maps Japan’s entanglement with other world regions over the past 500 years. His current book project, “The Clef and the Cross: Music and Kirishitan Transculturation in Sixteenth-Century Japan,” asks what early modern Japanese Catholicism sounded like and how it was understood and expressed through Buddhist frameworks of sound, music, and movement. His work to date has appeared in such venues as Early Music, Journal of Music History Pedagogy, Journal of Religious History, Journal of Jesuit Studies, Zeithistorische Forschungen, and Oxford Bibliographies in Music. A player of the viola da gamba, Takao completed a joint PhD in history and musicology at the University of Western Australia. Before joining MIT, he was an assistant professor of musicology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

de MIT News https://ift.tt/nxgsz0L